Ozzi wrote:
Is there an easy way to write something that can be either compiled
or interpreted
I'm not sure this is exactly what you're asking, but I find include
most useful:
$ cat bar.scm
(define (fac n)
(if (zero? n)
1
(* n (fac (- n 1)
$ cat foo.scm
(include bar)
(write
i am trying to build the svn trunk chicken on a ppc mac, osx 10.4.10
and its failing becuase for some reason the Makefile.macosx script is
calling /usr/local/bin/chicken which doesnt exist on my machine.
since the same software built fine on my 10.4 mac at work yesterday
im guessing the
Hi Rick,
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:31:27 -0500 Rick Taube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am trying to build the svn trunk chicken on a ppc mac, osx 10.4.10
and its failing becuase for some reason the Makefile.macosx script is
calling /usr/local/bin/chicken which doesnt exist on my machine.
since
ahh! thanks very much! it would be nice to add a line about this
differnece in the readme's installation section.
best, rick
To build chicken from SVN trunk you need an installed chicken. You
can pass a value for CHICKEN to make to indicate where chicken is:
$ make PLATFORM-=my-platform
Yes, I think this is what I was looking for. I would be interested in a
discussion about the differences between (use foo) and (include foo), and
which one is appropriate when.
I'm guessing use for shared libraries, where include is for bringing in pieces
of program code that have been broken
