That is certainly true. I do not mind creating a convenience function
to simulate the old behaviour.
On 11/1/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found it annyoing to see stuff twice in the repl, for example when piping
> expressions into csi (I somehow knew this change would come
(Hi!
I'd like to use this opportunity to point towards
http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/fmt.html
IMHO, much better and cleaner than C/CL-style formatted
printing.
cheers,
felix)
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.
On 11/1/07, Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Hmm, perhaps we should add printf and sprintf to format-modular and
> > start adding more printf-esque escape sequences? Or perhaps make a
> > separate 'printf' egg with them?
>
> Would it be possible to let the compiler convert the S
On 10/31/07, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Mario and I have just updated the version of Svnwiki in Galinha to the
> latest. This should have some minor user interface improvements and
> bug fixes.
>
> If you notice anything unusual, please let me know.
>
Excellent.
On 10/31/07, Zbigniew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In svn r6219 print was changed to return void at all times. Just
> wondering what prompted this change as it was useful for quick
> debugging, i.e. replace x with (print x) without affecting your
> results.
I found it annyoing to see stuff twice
Hi!
> Hmm, perhaps we should add printf and sprintf to format-modular and
> start adding more printf-esque escape sequences? Or perhaps make a
> separate 'printf' egg with them?
Would it be possible to let the compiler convert the Scheme printf form to
a C printf function call?
Groetjes,
Peter.
