Hi Joshua,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:44:11 -0600 Joshua Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone take a look at the documentation for the sandbox egg:
> http://chicken.wiki.br/sandbox
>
> It looks like it is missing.
It's at http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/sandbox.htm
On Jan 23, 2008 9:09 AM, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> felix winkelmann scripsit:
>
> > Compilation of Scheme with Stalin takes extremely long. The chicken-compiled
> > Stallin is smaller and doesn't stress gcc so much, but is (naturally)
> > even slower than the original Stalin, which me
Could someone take a look at the documentation for the sandbox egg:
http://chicken.wiki.br/sandbox
It looks like it is missing.
Thanks,
Josh
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-use
On Jan 22, 2008 2:41 PM, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might want to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], the author. I don't know
> if he is active with egg maintenance though.
I'm an active lurker... :)
Any of those options is fine by me -- if a patch comes my way, I'll
make sure it gets in
felix winkelmann scripsit:
> Compilation of Scheme with Stalin takes extremely long. The chicken-compiled
> Stallin is smaller and doesn't stress gcc so much, but is (naturally)
> even slower than the original Stalin, which means slow compiling Scheme to C.
Well, that's what I expected. But then
I've been slowly evolving a pair of native protocol (direct socket
comm, no lib) interfaces for MySQL and
Postgres along with some basic schemish functions like (map-query) and
(map-for-each). The code is
still pretty rough, but as it stabilizes, I was wondering if there's a
Chicken equivale
On Jan 22, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Jean-Philippe Theberge wrote:
OK, I keep in mind that you can easily and succesfully modify an
egg you had never used.
Sorry, not sure what you mean. A compliment? ;-)
I think this should be added to the mysql egg. I can provide a diff
or add it myself to the
OK, I keep in mind that you can easily and succesfully modify an egg you
had never used.
I think this should be added to the mysql egg. I can provide a diff or
add it myself to the egg if I am provided with a repository access.
Thanks a lot!
--
JP Theberge
Kon Lovett wrote:
On Jan 22, 20
On Jan 22, 2008 4:43 PM, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fair enough. I'm still not clear on whether it is actually slower or faster,
> though, or perhaps slower in general but faster when compiling Stalin, or
> what.
Stalin *can* (in the hands of someone experienced with it, and there
On Jan 22, 2008 11:04 PM, Mark Fredrickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lordy! Does Felix ever sleep?
>
"Sleep"? I don't have the time for such things.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mai
Lordy! Does Felix ever sleep?
-M
On Jan 22, 2008 3:58 PM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Another egg freshly available: advice
>
> http://chicken.wiki.br/advice
>
>
> cheers,
> felix
>
>
> ___
> Chicken-users mailing list
> Chic
Hi!
Another egg freshly available: advice
http://chicken.wiki.br/advice
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Jan 22, 2008 6:30 PM, Tobia Conforto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008, at 9:23 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Instead of making a choice between scgi, fastcgi, spiffy or plain cgi
> > I recommend having a look at the web-unity egg. This egg allows you
> > to write code independent of the
On Jan 22, 2008 10:21 PM, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Chicken has a "sedna" egg, for communicating with a Sedna XML database
> ( http://modis.ispras.ru/sedna/index.htm ). I was wondering if anyone
> on the list is using Sedna in a production environment, and might be
>
Hi folks,
Chicken has a "sedna" egg, for communicating with a Sedna XML database
( http://modis.ispras.ru/sedna/index.htm ). I was wondering if anyone
on the list is using Sedna in a production environment, and might be
able to comment on its effectiveness and efficiency?
Ultimately, I'm looking
On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:42 AM, Jean-Philippe Theberge wrote:
Hi,
I am having some trouble with the mysql egg mostly die to my
misunderstanding of c-pointers
With the egg you get data either by index or by name. What I would
like is more something like this example from the mysql-api
doc
Hi,
> tar xf ../web-unity.egg
xfz
Groetjes,
Peter.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Graham Fawcett wrote:
Is anyone else blogging much about Chicken these days? Is the world
ready for a Planet Chicken aggregate?
When I decided to try out Chicken (and Scheme with it) some months
ago, which I'm glad I did, it was because of how well Pythonists and
Rubyists and such were talk
John Cowan wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Even though the [chicken-stalin] compiler is even slower than the
original one, it compiles (the compiler itself) faster.
This is indecipherable.
I was wondering too what is faster or slower than what!
Chichen compiling Stalin to C, vs. Stalin co
Hi folks,
I just noticed that Hans Nowak, an Pythonista from days of yore, is
maintaing a blog about his adventures with Chicken:
Drinkable Chicken
http://4.flowsnake.org/
Perhaps you might like to pop over and comment on his posts.
Is anyone else blogging much about Chicken these days? Is the
On Jan 22, 2008 2:35 AM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A "stalin" egg has been added to the repository that provides
> a slightly modified version of Jeffrey Mark Siskinds Stalin
> Scheme->C compiler, compiled with chicken. Even though the
I assume the point is that stalin produces
On Jan 17, 2008, at 9:23 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
Instead of making a choice between scgi, fastcgi, spiffy or plain cgi
I recommend having a look at the web-unity egg. This egg allows you
to write code independent of the webserver/deployment method.
$ sudo chicken-setup web-unity
The extension we
felix winkelmann scripsit:
> chicken-stalin can be built on systems that are too weak to build
> the regular stalin, it also runs probably on more platforms.
> I think this is useful. Due to the reduced turnaround times and the much
> richer runtime environment, one can actually debug and enhance
On Jan 22, 2008 3:45 PM, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> felix winkelmann scripsit:
>
> > Even though the [chicken-stalin] compiler is even slower than the
> > original one, it compiles (the compiler itself) faster [...].
>
> This is indecipherable. The purpose of a compiler is to compile;
felix winkelmann scripsit:
> Even though the [chicken-stalin] compiler is even slower than the
> original one, it compiles (the compiler itself) faster [...].
This is indecipherable. The purpose of a compiler is to compile; if
chicken-stalin compiles the Stalin source code faster than native sta
Hi,
I am having some trouble with the mysql egg mostly die to my
misunderstanding of c-pointers
With the egg you get data either by index or by name. What I would like
is more something like this example from the mysql-api documentation
unsigned int num_fields;
unsigned int i;
MYSQL_FIELD
Hi!
A "stalin" egg has been added to the repository that provides
a slightly modified version of Jeffrey Mark Siskinds Stalin
Scheme->C compiler, compiled with chicken. Even though the
compiler is even slower than the original one, it compiles
(the compiler itself) faster and uses less resources (
27 matches
Mail list logo
