Re: [Chicken-users] opengl egg does not appear to compile under Chicken 3.0.0

2008-02-06 Thread felix winkelmann
On Feb 5, 2008 9:28 AM, Drake Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I now have Chicken with DEBUGBUILD=1 running in a GDB trying to > compile gl.scm with the same command line chicken-setup's csc > invocation said it was using before. It bombs with SEGV. I could > show the whole backtrace, but gi

Re: [Chicken-users] Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 available now

2008-02-06 Thread Matthew Welland
Thanks for doing this! BTW, if you publish directions on how to make the .deb's I'll make attempt to make them for ARM (targeting OS2008). If anyone else is doing this let me know. Matt -- On Wednesday 06 February 2008 07:42:58 am Ivan Raikov wrote: > Hi all, > >I have compiled Debian pack

Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-ref Error: (apply) bad argument type: #

2008-02-06 Thread Kon Lovett
On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Graham Fawcett wrote: On Feb 6, 2008 4:42 PM, Andre Kuehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CHICKEN Version 3.0.1 - linux-unix-gnu-x86 [ manyargs dload ptables applyhook ] (c)2000-2008 Felix L. Winkelmanncompiled 2008-02-05 on disko (Linux) SVN rev. 8157

Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-ref Error: (apply) bad argument type: #

2008-02-06 Thread Graham Fawcett
On Feb 6, 2008 4:42 PM, Andre Kuehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CHICKEN > Version 3.0.1 - linux-unix-gnu-x86 [ manyargs dload ptables applyhook ] > (c)2000-2008 Felix L. Winkelmanncompiled 2008-02-05 on disko (Linux) > SVN rev. 8157 > > #;1> (define x (make-hash-table)) > #;2> (hash-

[Chicken-users] hash-table-ref Error: (apply) bad argument type: #

2008-02-06 Thread Andre Kuehne
Hello! I am having a problem with this basic hash-table operation: csi -n CHICKEN Version 3.0.1 - linux-unix-gnu-x86 [ manyargs dload ptables applyhook ] (c)2000-2008 Felix L. Winkelmanncompiled 2008-02-05 on disko (Linux) SVN rev. 8157 #;1> (define x (make-hash-table)) #;2> (ha

[Chicken-users] egg update: hart 1.1.2

2008-02-06 Thread Graham Fawcett
Hi folks, I've just committed a new release (1.1.2) of the 'hart' HTML-generation egg on the release/3 branch. The egg itself should be available the next time the egg-post-commit job runs. This is a bugfix release to correct an error in the evaluation of attribute expressions. For example, in th

Re: [Chicken-users] smtp egg

2008-02-06 Thread Daishi Kato
At Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:06:12 +0100, felix winkelmann wrote: > > On Feb 5, 2008 9:42 AM, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks. > > But we also need to add flush-output > > when closing the DATA port. > > I found it now... > > Sorry, I'm not quite clear about this: wouldn't closing

[Chicken-users] Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 available now

2008-02-06 Thread Ivan Raikov
Hi all, I have compiled Debian packages for Chicken 3.0.0 on Intel architectures. Instructions on how to install them are here: http://chicken.wiki.br/Debian%20packages Let me know if you have any problems or suggestions. -Ivan ___ Chicken-

Re: [Chicken-users] critical-section not in Chicken 3?

2008-02-06 Thread Elf
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Ivan Raikov wrote: It is quite frustrating that so many programmers choose to multithread their software when it is not necessary, and introduce all kinds of complications for themselves and their users. Just say no to threads. fwiw, threads are not always avoidable. i

Re: [Chicken-users] critical-section not in Chicken 3?

2008-02-06 Thread Ivan Raikov
That's a really good point, and my aversion to threads was one of the reasons why I created the mpi egg. MPI forks processes that are completely separate from each other, and yet it provides enough synchronization and communication primitives for fairly complex concurrent applications. And my ex

Re: [Chicken-users] critical-section not in Chicken 3?

2008-02-06 Thread felix winkelmann
On Feb 5, 2008 8:11 PM, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 5, 2008 1:11 PM, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Graham, > > > > > > > > I don't know why Felix deprecated 'critical-section'. I to had a couple of > uses for it. > > ...You might want to ask the reason. >

Re: [Chicken-users] smtp egg

2008-02-06 Thread felix winkelmann
On Feb 5, 2008 9:42 AM, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks. > But we also need to add flush-output > when closing the DATA port. > I found it now... Sorry, I'm not quite clear about this: wouldn't closing the tcp port flush any remaining output automatically? cheers, felix _