Hm... let's try to remember...
BASIC (Ti Basic, TI Extended Basic)
PASCAL (in School)
more BASIC
6502 machine code (decimal, later assembler)
C (long and intensively, but without real success)
Learned about Lisp (1.5 dialect, really)
Forth (a bit)
Smalltalk (temporarily)
Lisp
Common Lisp
Scheme
C+
Interesting thread. I keep doing loops that take me away from scheme and
eventually I come back. Now, in part thanks to Chicken, I'm back to stay.
Basic, Fortran
Lisp (Autocad)
HP Basic, Pascal (IC test stuff)
Scheme (College, scoops and PC Scheme)
Pascal, C, Assembly (College)
Scheme (STk)
Awk/
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce my first egg: Stacktor.
Stacktor is a DSL for programming in a stack based style, like
languages such as Forth or Factor. The idea came from a talk at my
local Ruby user's group by Slava Pestov on Factor. While I know Slava
likes Lisp/Scheme, he made an offha
I'll also update eggdoc-svnwiki with the new syntax (or whatever final
form it takes) once that gets put in the wiki.
And in that vein:
The four types of definitions in eggdoc are "procedure",
"macro", "record" and "parameter", with an extra "signature" type which
is used when you want to name a
On Feb 16, 2008 9:05 PM, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @ University:
> (Algol W & Snobol 4 & 360 BAL & Fortran 4 - course work, not too
> serious)
>
> [snip]
>
> No Work:
> Python (minor, just to learn)
> Io (minor, just to learn)
> Chicken Scheme & C
>
> Strange road it has been,
> Kon
On Feb 18, 2008 1:45 PM, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 05:03:47PM -0500, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> > The CL community has a "My Road to Lisp" meme, where CL users write up a
> > quick story on how they "arrived". I'd *love* to hear people's My Road
> to
> > Chicken s
Oh, okay, this looks pretty good. Not as pretty as the original
eggdoc, but it will do. I will try converting some of my docs with
eggdoc-svnwiki this weekend, thanks.
-Ivan
"Jim Ursetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ivan,
>
> The symbol-table is essentially a nod to aesthetics--it jus
Mark Fredrickson scripsit:
> Rexx (I never discovered if this was a real language or just a
> teaching tool at my school.
Very real. At one time it was the only scripting-style language
supported on OS/2, and it still exists in several forms, one of which
(NetRexx) runs on the Java VM.
See h
Well, my experience with RPM is also a bit dated, and it was limited
to translating custom Debian kernel packages to RedHat and Mandrake
RPMs. In my case, it worked well because all three distributions used
the same script to update the kernel image installation, and of course
the kernel has no
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 05:03:47PM -0500, Graham Fawcett wrote:
The CL community has a "My Road to Lisp" meme, where CL users write
up a
quick story on how they "arrived". I'd *love* to hear people's My
Road to
Chicken stories.
Pre-universit
if you cant fix it on webserver end, we have some potential fixes on this end
but it would be a lot more work for the Very Nice Person who has been handling
dns issues since the computer fire.
-elf
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Peter Bex wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:49:15AM -0800, Elf wrote:
ww
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:49:15AM -0800, Elf wrote:
>
> www.. are all now cnames for
> www.call-with-current-continuation.org ... which isnt working too hot.
>
> advice please?
Looks like call-cc's vhosting isn't set up to dispatch those domains.
Felix: Can you fix this on the webserver end?
C
www.. are all now cnames for
www.call-with-current-continuation.org ... which isnt working too hot.
advice please?
-elf
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 03:03:22PM -0800, Elf wrote:
>
> chickenscheme.org
> chickenscheme.net
> chicken-scheme.com
> chicken-scheme.org
> chicken-scheme.net
>
> (someone has already parked on chickenscheme.com, unfortunately. this should
> prevent people from doing anything nasty to the namespa
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 05:03:47PM -0500, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> The CL community has a "My Road to Lisp" meme, where CL users write up a
> quick story on how they "arrived". I'd *love* to hear people's My Road to
> Chicken stories.
A little painful to admit, but I started out with BASIC on the C
I just want to say Thank You, Felix, for all the great work you've put
in making Chicken. It is my favorite programming
implementation/environment and has definitely made much life much
easier.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
_
> By the way, on the subject of wiki markup, I'd like to put in a plug
> for marking index entries.
Hmm, what do you mean?
Alejo, a bit slow today.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.non
On 18/02/2008, Harri Haataja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been a while since I was last involved with rpm, but even then it
> was certainly worth it making different spec files (and/or taking care
> you don't use the wrong ones). It's not just the dependencies and
> paths (which obviously matt
Upgrading to sqlite 3.5.6 on the linux box seems to have fixed it.
Ozzi wrote:
The sqlite3 egg seems to have issues on Dreamhost (Linux). Works fine on
OS X here.
;; Works fine...
(sqlite3:prepare (sqlite3:open "db.sqlite3") "select * from foo")
;; but do the same thing again...
(sqlite3:prep
On 13/02/2008, Ivan Raikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the Debian egg packages can be easily converted to RPM by the
> alien program, but there might be slight differences in how each RPM
> distribution does its library version numbering. E.g. the estraier egg
> depends on libestraier8 pac
On Feb 17, 2008 9:01 PM, Jim Ursetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. The toplevel directory is for release 2 only, and will
> probably be renamed later to release/2, but has not yet
> been to retain backwards compatibility.
>
Moving all the stuff into a "release/2" directory should
probably wor
On Feb 17, 2008 12:52 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > what remains relevant is that its bloody hard to document anything
> > even slightly nontrivial in it.
>
> While this is not my perception, I've heard this claim in the past. I
> would like to see if Svnwiki can be
22 matches
Mail list logo
