$ csi -R numbers
...
#;1 (= 0.1 (/ 1 10))
#f
#;2 (= 0.1 (exact-inexact (/ 1 10)))
#f
#;3 (exact-inexact (/ 1 10))
0.1
Note that both equalities hold when not using the numbers
egg. Exact = comparisons on floating point numbers are
rare, but this is just a symptom of a more general issue
which
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:02 PM, William Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm working with the xlib egg, which naturally calls the xlib c
procedures.In a case where the egg function has a parameter of
(POINTER UNSIGNED-CHAR) what do I use? In other words how do I create a
pointer
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Tony Sidaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using http.egg to write a bot that has to login to a ubb forum, I
discovered that the cookie processing order of that egg resulted in
login failure. When I tweaked http:read-request-attributes to
reverse the order of
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Raymond Medeiros
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can someone give me a reasonable explanation as to why this would not
work on Win32 but works properly on Linux?
what am i missing here?
Just curious, in what way doesn't it work?
Graham
(use tcp-server)
Alex Shinn scripsit:
As a potential workaround, I've attached a patch which first
checks if both the numerator and denominator fit within a
long (there's no direct way to check if they fit in a
double), and if so just uses the straight C operations
(double) numerator / (double)
I have an error handler that traps errors under callbacks using with-
exception-handler. its wroking quite well except that I dont know how
to get all the error information to print out. for example if i eval
an unbound symbol in the REPL the message includes the name of the
offending
Hi, I am trying to build a binary using autoconf. Everything had been
working fine until my program required the posix unit. The build now
bombs out as follows:
posixunix.c: In function 'stub355':
posixunix.c:615: error: 'C_group' undeclared (first use in this function)
posixunix.c:615: error:
hi,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 06:12:15PM -0400, Raymond Medeiros wrote:
(define send-data
(lambda (ip port msg)
(define-values (i o) (tcp-connect (-string ip) port))
(write msg o)
(let ((result (read-line i)))
(close-input-port i)
(close-output-port o) result)))
john scripsit:
Hi, I am trying to build a binary using autoconf. Everything had been
working fine until my program required the posix unit. The build now
bombs out as follows:
The autoconf build has been dead for a long time. Please download a more recent
snapshot and build that.
--
John
Sorry I was not clear. I am using Chicken 3.0.0 but I am trying to
build a binary using the Chicken source together with my app. The
reason being I want to distribute the binary on platforms (embedded
Linux) without Chicken. It is just the posix unit giving me problems.
I only appear to be using a
Quoth Graham Fawcett [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-03-28 09:59:16 -0400:
RFC2109 allows for multiple Set-Cookies, but it also
warns that an intervening gateway could fold multiple such headers
into a single header. Since folding is undefined, there's no way
the origin server can guarantee the
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Drake Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[RFC excerpts snipped]
My interpretation of this is:
- Forwarders are not permitted to rearrange multiple Set-Cookie
headers. HTTP client and server libraries have the same
constraint.
- Origin servers
John == John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Alex Shinn scripsit:
As a potential workaround, I've attached a patch
which first checks if both the numerator and
denominator fit within a long (there's no direct way
to check if they fit in a double), and if so just
Some time ago, I posted a draft of a rework of Chapter 1 of the
manual, at
http://chicken.wiki.br/new-chapter1. A number of you made changes and
additions,
and today I made my final set of revisions, so I now declare this to be
Ready To Go.
I'm not sure of the exact mechanism for doing this,
14 matches
Mail list logo
