On May 16, 2008, at 6:34 AM, Hans Bulfone wrote:
my question is: will it still be possible to write a (er-) macro that
creates new identifiers like define-record does?
In most hygienic macro systems it's possible to "break" hygiene for
the purposes of introducing identifiers. I don't believe
On May 14, 2008, at 10:52 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
It's silent in here So, let me use this moment to give
some progress info on the state of the "hygienic"
chicken that I'm currently working on. In
As someone who has been searching for a Scheme to use
I couldn't be happier to see this
On 16 May 2008, at 11:34 am, Hans Bulfone wrote:
my question is: will it still be possible to write a (er-) macro that
creates new identifiers like define-record does? from previous
postings i got differing impressions.
Yes, I think so. You expand to a form of the form "(begin (define
foo ...
Hi,
I was wondering if there's a procedure like mysql-closed?
because I'd like to know if a connection is alive or not.
Hoping mysql-ping does the job, but giving me a segfault.
Any workaround for this?
Thanks,
Daishi
CHICKEN
(c)2008 The Chicken Team
(c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
Version 3.2
hi,
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:52:17PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> It would be helpful if the chicken users and hackers take a moment
> to consider whether this is acceptable and right, or whether we
> should keep the current system, which is less scalable in terms of
> modularity, but never
