This is one of the few coder communities I interact with regularily,
so I'd appreciate comments on
http://rlpowell.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/what-is-it-about-testing-i-dont-understand/
-Robin
--
Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo
Proud Supporter of the Singularity In
Whoops, failed to CC the list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kyle R. Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Soundex
To: felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> chicken-setup slib should work ok. The problem with slib is that
>
Hi!
I just checked something in to allow exporting all definitions form a module,
use it like this:
(module NAME all
BODY ...)
Might be helpful porting old code.
Is anybody actually trying this thing out?
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Stephen Eilert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, didn't see the message before.
>
> I'm also willing to contribute, if necessary.
>
Great! Now, this is the right moment for someone (John?) to pick this up
and start to coordinate! I'll happily
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Kyle R. Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see that there is a Soundex that is part of slib, and that slib is
> compatible with Chicken - but I couldn't figure out how to get it up
> and running in my chicken instance. I saw referenced at one point
> that the
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:20:35AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2008, at 11:15 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
>>
>> So the MySQL egg seems to *almost* have support for prepared
>> statements; there's certainly a bunch of relevant code in there.
>> In particular, mysql-stmt-query is define
On Jun 15, 2008, at 11:15 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
So the MySQL egg seems to *almost* have support for prepared
statements; there's certainly a bunch of relevant code in there. In
particular, mysql-stmt-query is defined and appears to be exported,
but attempting to use it I get
Error: unb
After recently rereading Alex's informative post on Chicken macro
systems a month or so ago, I was trying out riaxpander as a
replacement for syntactic-closures, but have just run into some rather
odd behaviour.
System: Linux, Chicken 3.2.0 (SVN rev. 10664),
riaxpander Version: 0.8.1 (Release 200
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM, naruto canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> actually I find another way to trigger the bug, having nothing to do
> with bignum literals:
>
> other schemes:
> ;; (factorial n)
> ;; test memorized recursion
> (newline)
> (factorial 55)
> ;'done
> ;1269640335365827592
On 6/16/08, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:30 AM, naruto canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> hi
>>
>> I thinks there is a bug in big numbers extension or somewhere else...
>> I am not sure.
>>
>
> From a quick peek I can infer at least the following: the
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:30 AM, naruto canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
>
> I thinks there is a bug in big numbers extension or somewhere else...
> I am not sure.
>
>From a quick peek I can infer at least the following: the compiler
does currently not support bignum literals, the large exac
11 matches
Mail list logo
