[Chicken-users] Re: tcp-read-timeout: procedure or parameter?

2008-06-25 Thread William Xu
Alex Sandro Queiroz e Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > may call procedures that have a tcp-read-timeout free > variable, but due to lexical scope that variable will most certainly not > be bound to the one you want. For this you need dynamic scope. Do you mean something like the procedur

[Chicken-users] Re: tcp-read-timeout: procedure or parameter?

2008-06-25 Thread William Xu
"Jim Ursetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Although unit tcp doesn't have an explicit API for setting socket > options, it is possible to do this for server sockets. (IIRC it can't > be done at the moment for clients as that socket is not directly > exposed to the user.) That sounds a big str

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: tcp-read-timeout: procedure or parameter?

2008-06-25 Thread Alex Sandro Queiroz e Silva
Hallo, William Xu wrote: Alex Sandro Queiroz e Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: may call procedures that have a tcp-read-timeout free variable, but due to lexical scope that variable will most certainly not be bound to the one you want. For this you need dynamic scope. Do you mean som