Rene Sansman wrote:
[...]
Chicken has worked wonderfully for me so far, but now I have run into
a problem I don't know how to solve. I want to use tinyclos from the
repl, but it does not work. I can use it from compiled code or from
the interpreter, but not from a repl that I start from a compil
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 12:57 +0200 schrieb Thomas Chust:
> Rene Sansman wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > Chicken has worked wonderfully for me so far, but now I have run into
> > a problem I don't know how to solve. I want to use tinyclos from the
> > repl, but it does not work. I can use it from co
are you using the eval unit and using the repl function contained therein, or
did you roll your own repl? also, you should be able to require the
chicken-more-macros via (require 'chicken-more-macros) at the top.
-elf
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.0
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 07:19 -0700 schrieb Elf:
> are you using the eval unit and using the repl function contained
> therein, or
> did you roll your own repl? also, you should be able to require the
> chicken-more-macros via (require 'chicken-more-macros) at the top.
>
Thanks a lot, the
(also, if you (declare (uses eval)) , theres a (repl) procedure that will
handle most all of this for you, along with hooks if you want to do your
own modifications... read eval.scm in the chicken source for more details. :)
im not familiar with srfi-49, but the behaviour that i think you were
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It assumes that it can call "read" on a port when peek-char
> returns #\( and assumes that, once "read" read the expression, can
> continue to read from the port right after the corresponding #\) .
> Unfortunately ch
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 16:53 +0200 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
> Unfortunately chicken's read has already read from the port until the
> next #\( - so the SRFI-49 code gets confused. Does anybody have a nice
> Scheme reader in pure Scheme or Chicken-Scheme at hand?
Sorry, I blamed the w
what do you mean by a 'pure scheme reader'?
-elf
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 16:53 +0200 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Unfortunately chicken's read has already read from the port until the
next #\( - so the SRFI-49 code gets confused. Doe
Hi all,
I have some lines of Scheme, which rely on SRF-34 and I don't really
want to change that code.
I can hardly imagine, that I can't replace chickens exception handler.
But I can't.
What I tried was to overwrite ##sys#error and friends (see appended
source - which does not really get the j
chicken already supports most of srfi-34 natively and the rest is supported
via an egg. have you looked at all at the manual or at the egg libs yet?
-elf
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Hi all,
I have some lines of Scheme, which rely on SRF-34 and I don't really
want to ch
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Shawn Rutledge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:15 PM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I never used Bitbake, but are available if you have any questions,
>> of course. I know a bit about ipk's, though (having re-implemented
>> t
hi,
the procedure char-ready? (which is part of r5rs) seems to be missing
in the scheme module.
bye,
hans.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Hans Bulfone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> the procedure char-ready? (which is part of r5rs) seems to be missing
> in the scheme module.
>
Oops. Fixed. Thanks.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chick
13 matches
Mail list logo
