Re: [Chicken-users] need regex benchmark

2008-11-11 Thread Alex Shinn
Tobia Conforto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alex Shinn wrote: >> Tobia Conforto writes: >>> The file perltestdata in Edi Weitz's cl-ppcre contains a big PCRE >>> stress test (15,000 tests) already formatted for lisp. >> >> What Felix is looking for, however, is a benchmark. > > What's wrong with

Re: [Chicken-users] using the compiler at runtime

2008-11-11 Thread Mark Fredrickson
While this is probably not what you are looking for, there is always (system "csc -s path/to/file.scm"). This should help with issues of using (eval ...). You can (write ...) your code to a temp file, run csc on it, and (load ...) the .so. If you are trying to compile a closure, I'm not sur

[Chicken-users] using the compiler at runtime

2008-11-11 Thread Felix Lange
hi, chicken-users, i've been using chicken scheme for quite a while now, and would like to request a feature (or at least a hint on doing something roughly equivalent). most, if not all common lisp implementations provide the 'compile-file and 'compile functions. these are very useful for imp

Re: [Chicken-users] need regex benchmark

2008-11-11 Thread Tobia Conforto
Alex Shinn wrote: Tobia Conforto writes: The file perltestdata in Edi Weitz's cl-ppcre contains a big PCRE stress test (15,000 tests) already formatted for lisp. What Felix is looking for, however, is a benchmark. What's wrong with repeating 1000 times each of those test cases, at least t