On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 12:10:39AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
>>
>> Ok, here is what Marc Feeley, the author of SRFI-18 has to say
>> about this:
>
>
>>
>> >Hope that clarifies things.
>>
>> Hope that clarifies things.
>
> Yup, thanks for as
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 08:48:26PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The cleanup I'm suggesting does not necessarily have to be major, the
> immediate proposal of this mail is simply to move all the eggdocs to
> a new subdirectory eggref/3, to match eggref/4 and also to match the
> egg structu
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
>
> The bug becomes more and more phantasmagorical!
>
> When initially compiling chicken-boot with "make PLATFORM=linux
> DEBUGBUILD=yes bootstrap" the bug does not appear.
>
> When using -:d OR -:s500k OR -:s1m the bug does not appear.
>
> Whe
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
>
> This has been implemented now.
>
> For example, you can visit http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/9p to view the
> Chicken 3 documentation for the 9p egg and http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/9p
> to view the Chicken 4 documentation for the egg.
(Sh
2009/3/10 felix winkelmann :
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
>>
>> This has been implemented now.
>>
>> For example, you can visit http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/9p to view the
>> Chicken 3 documentation for the 9p egg and http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/9p
>> to view the Chic
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:21:51PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
> >
> > This has been implemented now.
> >
> > For example, you can visit http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/9p to view the
> > Chicken 3 documentation for the 9p egg and
> > http://
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> However, it turns out that an exception thrown in a thread simply
> terminates the thread instead of unwinding the stack. The same does not
> happen in the primordial thread:
> $ csi
> #;2> (dynamic-wind (lambda () (print "BEFORE")) (lambda () (
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:43:00PM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> Hi Peter. You might disagree with the rationale, but the behavior is
> in fact consistent--your example only happens to work at the REPL.
Jim, thanks for that explanation. It cleared up a lot!
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
John Cowan wrote:
Tobia Conforto scripsit:
I wonder how other compilers do it. For example, I find Java's
(and Python's) try/finally syntax quite useful. I've always
thought dynamic-wind was Scheme's equivalent construct, but it
would appear I was mistaken.
Here's the relevant writeup f
