On Mar 11, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Lam Luu wrote:
Kon Lovett wrote:
Try process/process* in Unit posix.
Somehow, in my version, process and process* return only 1 values,
which is the output of the process.
How you capturing the result of 'process/process*' - something like
'(receive (
Kon Lovett wrote:
Try process/process* in Unit posix.
Somehow, in my version, process and process* return only 1 values, which
is the output of the process. The version (returned by "csi -v") is
Version 3.4.0 - linux-unix-gnu-x86-64[ 64bit manyargs dload ptables
applyhook ]
This mismatc
> Lam Luu writes:
> Hello everyone! I am trying to write a Scheme script to drive GNU/Go
> through its stdin/stdout. However, there seems to be no way to create
> a bi-directional pipe toward another process. On the other hand, when
> I try to call create-pipe, the returned descriptors s
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Lam Luu wrote:
Hello everyone!
I am trying to write a Scheme script to drive GNU/Go through its
stdin/stdout. However, there seems to be no way to create a bi-
directional pipe toward another process. On the other hand, when I
try to call create-pipe, the ret
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:19:56PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
> >
> > The bug becomes more and more phantasmagorical!
> >
> > When initially compiling chicken-boot with "make PLATFORM=linux
> > DEBUGBUILD=yes bootstrap" the bug does not a
Hello everyone!
I am trying to write a Scheme script to drive GNU/Go through its
stdin/stdout. However, there seems to be no way to create a
bi-directional pipe toward another process. On the other hand, when I
try to call create-pipe, the returned descriptors seems to be unusable,
since it i
Peter Bex scripsit:
> If you keep the chicken 3 eggdocs around, I think it's fair to keep the
> manual around too. The rationale for that would be that if there are
> people still relying on Chicken 3 (and possibly writing/maintaining code
> in Chicken 3), they'd want to refer to the manual every
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:05:28AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> >
> > No problem. ?Can we do the same thing for the manual, soon?
> > I volunteer to do that as well, but would like to know if there are
> > gotchas like the Eggs Unlimited 3 pa
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
>
> No problem. Can we do the same thing for the manual, soon?
> I volunteer to do that as well, but would like to know if there are
> gotchas like the Eggs Unlimited 3 page (which is currently broken, it
> links to call/cc.org instead of directly
