Re: [Chicken-users] Re: User's Manual Comments

2009-08-05 Thread felix winkelmann
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Sam Varnersnick-a-...@comcast.net wrote: The user's manual link from http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/ still looks the same. Here's the HTML.        h3DOCUMENTATION/h3        p        Browse the a href=http://chicken.wiki.br/man/4/;User's        

Re: [Chicken-users] CHICKEN 4.1.0 released

2009-08-05 Thread felix winkelmann
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Mario Domenech Goulartmario.goul...@gmail.com wrote: It seems that it's -block which is causing the failure.  Take a look: Indeed. On a hunch, I addeds debugging output in bit-test and diffing the trace output seems to indicate some bit-twiddling isuse. But why

Re: [Chicken-users] SQLite3 bindings for CHICKEN 4

2009-08-05 Thread Thomas Chust
2009/8/5 John Cowan co...@ccil.org: [...] How do I persuade chicken-install to accept this egg?  Even with -t local, it insists on looking up the egg with henrietta on kitten (or your server, if I specify -l), gets a 301, and dies. [...] Hello, indeed that doesn't work :-( What usually does

Re: [Chicken-users] SQLite3 bindings for CHICKEN 4

2009-08-05 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:37:37AM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote: Hello, I finally got around to touch the code of the SQLite3 egg again: To make it compatible with CHICKEN 4 I created a version without a dependency on TinyCLOS, replacing classes with record types and multimethods with regular

Re: [Chicken-users] SQLite3 bindings for CHICKEN 4

2009-08-05 Thread Thomas Chust
2009/8/5 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl: [...] You haven't seen zbigniew's sql-de-lite egg yet?  It's another sqlite egg with (IMHO) a more Schemely API. [...] Hello, of course I have seen it, but several people requested my SQLite3 binding to be ported to CHICKEN 4 anyway. The APIs of the

Re: [Chicken-users] SQLite3 bindings for CHICKEN 4

2009-08-05 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 01:36:55PM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote: of course I have seen it, but several people requested my SQLite3 binding to be ported to CHICKEN 4 anyway. Fair enough, I just wanted to point it out :) The APIs of the two bindings don't differ too much in my opinion, but it

Re: [Chicken-users] SQLite3 bindings for CHICKEN 4

2009-08-05 Thread Thomas Chust
2009/8/5 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl: [...] Could you elaborate which parts of the sql-de-lite API seem more schemely to you? sqlite3 is more OO-like and has many operations which are purely invoked for their side-effects (returning #void), whereas sql-de-lite seems more FP-like and

Re: [Chicken-users] SQLite3 bindings for CHICKEN 4

2009-08-05 Thread John Cowan
Thomas Chust scripsit: indeed that doesn't work :-( What usually does work if everything else fails is to unpack the egg into an empty directory and just run chicken-install without any arguments (except maybe -s) inside that directory. That fails thus: $ chicken-install -s Warning:

Re: [Chicken-users] SQLite3 bindings for CHICKEN 4

2009-08-05 Thread Kon Lovett
On Aug 5, 2009, at 8:14 AM, John Cowan wrote: Thomas Chust scripsit: indeed that doesn't work :-( What usually does work if everything else fails is to unpack the egg into an empty directory and just run chicken-install without any arguments (except maybe -s) inside that directory. That