In one sense, this is good news!
A question: does the builtin syntax-rules accept the (... ...) syntax
that Dybvig's system does? My code has some macros that expand to macro
definitions, the canonical case where nested ... is often necessary.
(Or, alternatively, does it support some other met
Dan Liebgold scripsit:
> I probably have something obvious wrong, but after installing the
> syntax-case egg in Chicken 4.2.0 I can't "require" it, and I can't make
> sense of the error:
Chicken 4.x doesn't support the syntax-case egg or any other macrology egg.
It now has built-in macros, and su
I probably have something obvious wrong, but after installing the
syntax-case egg in Chicken 4.2.0 I can't "require" it, and I can't make
sense of the error:
> csi -R syntax-case
CHICKEN
(c)2008-2009 The Chicken Team
(c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
Version 4.2.0 - SVN rev. 16023
linux-unix-gnu-x
