Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with chicken-install -p

2010-04-22 Thread Felix
From: Jeronimo Pellegrini j...@aleph0.info Subject: [Chicken-users] Problem with chicken-install -p Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:49:32 -0300 Hello, After this changeset: 098a8b9a626ce58f0f8f5d8c7c85889df04604fb added destination-prefix to make installation-prefix compatible again I can no

Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-install from behind a proxy

2010-04-22 Thread Felix
From: Paul Romanchenko paula...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-install from behind a proxy Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:28:18 +0400 Ok, again this bug hit me. Captured conversation attached. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Paul Romanchenko paula...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, when

Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-install from behind a proxy

2010-04-22 Thread Paul Romanchenko
I think I'm close to nail the bug. This is setup-download.scm, the part when the size and body of file are read. After reading size, you read an line like this (_ (read-line in)); When using proxy this actually EATS the line from body, so when next you read string of body, you eats the description

Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with chicken-install -p

2010-04-22 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
Hi, On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:41:57PM +0200, Felix wrote: Do make confclean clean and rebuild. This should work. I did: make confclean clean . scripts/build-boot-chicken.sh chicken linux bunzip chicken-boot-.gz2 make PLATFORM=linux CHICKEN=./chicken-boot- make uninstall make install But

[Chicken-users] Weird macro behaviour

2010-04-22 Thread Peter Bex
Hi all, I'm experimenting a bit, trying to understand how the renaming and comparing of er-macros work, and I found this really strange thing; if I copy the definition of er-macro-transformer and the definitions it depends on to my own file and execute it, I get a different behaviour than with

Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?

2010-04-22 Thread Jim Ursetto
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: BTW, I've benchmarked complex reading ad writing too. I suppose the difference is huge for reading complexes because the read procedure doesn't know that it's a complex number. Hi there. Your numbers looked odd to me so I downloaded and

Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?

2010-04-22 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
Hello! On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 02:25:00PM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote: Here are my numbers: scheme fast-io line numbers 1.8 2.1 -- write fixnum26 2126 26 read fixnum61 2022 211