I have a module embedded-test that exports a procedure called
'register' and a macro called 'test' that transforms a form into a
call to 'register'. It looks like this (I'm simplifying a lot):
(module embedded-test (test register)
(import chicken scheme)
(define (register) #f)
(define-sy
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:04:02PM +0200, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
>
> Am I doing something wrong? I've tried various combinations of 'use',
> 'import', 'require-library', 'import-for-syntax' and
> 'require-extension' to no avail. How does one make a macro transform
> a form into a call to
> I didn't get the error you're getting, but I think what you need is this
> section from the manual:
>
> [snip]
>
> In other words, do (module embedded-test ((test register)) ...)
>
> I think it worked because the code you pasted in the mail also exported
> REGISTER, which your real code perha
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:59:13PM +0200, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
> The generated embedded-test.import.scm has this:
>
> (eval '(import chicken scheme))
> (##sys#register-compiled-module
> 'embedded-test
> (list '(register . embedded-test#register))
> '((register . embedded-
From: Alejandro Forero Cuervo
Subject: [Chicken-users] bug in let-optionals in 4.5.0?
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:33:58 +0200
> Now I'm stuck in another problem, it seems to be caused by a bug in
> let-optionals. In Chicken 3.4.0, the following form evaluates to #f,
> as expected:
>
> (let-optio
From: Alejandro Forero Cuervo
Subject: [Chicken-users] How to load an extension?
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 19:19:20 +0200
>
> If an extension called, say, 'hello' has been installed, what's the
> canonical way, with Chicken 4, to load it?
(require-extension hello)
>
> I'm confused with require-ex
From: Lucas Jones
Subject: [Chicken-users] Impossible constraint in asm
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 23:17:02 +0100
> Hello,
Hi!
>
> I am trying to compile a cross-chicken for the Wii using the latest
> DevKitPro. It provides a cross-compiling gcc 4.4.3 with the host
> 'powerpc-eabi'. (The compiler i
> Yes, I'm using 4.5.0, but I didn't install the extension. I just ran
> (use embedded-test) from the directory where I compiled it.
>
> Could you send me a tarball containing the full egg as-is, including the
> setup and meta files?
I'm attaching it to this message. Here is how I use it:
tar
Oh, BTW, the meta file has a "needs" entry that you'll probably want
to remove while testing this.
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Try
(define-for-syntax (register) #f)
--Stephen
Sent from my Emacs
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
wrote:
> Oh, BTW, the meta file has a "needs" entry that you'll probably want
> to remove while testing this.
>
> Alejo.
> http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
>
> _
From: Alejandro Forero Cuervo
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Exporting proc and macro that references it?
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:59:13 +0200
>
>> I didn't get the error you're getting, but I think what you need is this
>> section from the manual:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> In other words, do (module e
Am Montag, den 05.07.2010, 00:33 +0200 schrieb Alejandro Forero Cuervo:
> I'm experimenting with my format-compiler extension. I got past the
> limitation preventing the module system from dealing with recursively
> dependent modules
I would not call this a limitation. IMHO a module system, whi
Hi,
I'm surprised about the memory consumption pattern my chicken program
exhibits after some hours running. Though I'd like to get a hand on
exploration, since I have no idea how to boil it down to a test case.
As it appears from more or less regular watching "top" I see the process
as if was g
> >> I didn't get the error you're getting, but I think what you need is this
> >> section from the manual:
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> In other words, do (module embedded-test ((test register)) ...)
> >>
> >> I think it worked because the code you pasted in the mail also exported
> >> REGISTER,
Thanks for the quick fix!
Can I assume that this will be fixed in the next Chicken release? Do
you have a rough estimate of when the next release will be made?
Thanks!
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users
This makes perfect sense. Thanks for the explanation.
> > If an extension called, say, 'hello' has been installed, what's the
> > canonical way, with Chicken 4, to load it?
>
> (require-extension hello)
>
> >
> > I'm confused with require-extension, require-library, require, import,
> > use an
2010/7/5 Jörg F. Wittenberger :
> [...]
> I'm surprised about the memory consumption pattern my chicken program
> exhibits after some hours running.
> [...]
> whereby the difference has a change to be attributed to some
> string->symbol usage.)
> [...]
Hello,
this may be completely irrelevant, bu
17 matches
Mail list logo
