From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] current-time on 32-bit hardware
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:01:26 +0200
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Felix
wrote:
Peter Bex wrote:
> > I'd suggest you use numbers but I don't think thread-sleep! accepts
> > bignums.
Felix replied:
> That won't cha
Felix,
Thanks. Now that I think about it - wow! From a newbie question, to a patch
from the language implementor himself - all in the matter of a week.
Dizzying
I applied the patch against vanilla 4.5.0, and it works perfectly. If anyone
is using chicken-4.5.0 on gentoo, attached is a slight
Hi Nick
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:58:41 +0100 Nick Keighley
wrote:
> The instructions for installing eggs involve invoking chicken-install. I can't
> find this. I'm running on a windows system.
What version of chicken do you have installed? Where did you install
it?
Best wishes.
Mario
--
http:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Nick Keighley wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The instructions for installing eggs involve invoking chicken-install. I
> can't find this. I'm running on a windows system.
>
Are you running Chicken 4?
If you're running chicken 3 the program is called "chicken-
Hi,
The instructions for installing eggs involve invoking chicken-install. I can't
find this. I'm running on a windows system.
thanks, Nick Keighley
_
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013
From: Imran Rafique
Subject: [Chicken-users] newbie questions about macros in modules
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:46:39 -0700
> 2) module io defines a macro (debug-info) and a function (print-info).
> debug-info calls print-info. If module io is imported without a prefix, then
> it works. If module
From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] current-time on 32-bit hardware
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:01:26 +0200
>
> That's why Felix couldn't reproduce it; I'm willing to bet he tried it
> on 64 bits only.
> This number cannot be represented as a fixnum on a 32 bit platform,
> because it requ
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:34:27PM +0900, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
>> >> Warning (#): : (inexact->exact) inexact number
>> >> cannot be represented as an exact\
>> >> number: 1189553855.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I can not reproduce this. On what
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:34:27PM +0900, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
> >> Warning (#): : (inexact->exact) inexact number
> >> cannot be represented as an exact\
> >> number: 1189553855.
> >>
> >
> > I can not reproduce this. On what platform are you running this
> > code?
>
> It is a 32-bit
>> Warning (#): : (inexact->exact) inexact number
>> cannot be represented as an exact\
>> number: 1189553855.
>>
>
> I can not reproduce this. On what platform are you running this
> code?
It is a 32-bit Linux on a Pentium R. If my understanding is correct,
the following call is subject
10 matches
Mail list logo