-- Forwarded message --
From: "Jon L White\(G\)"
To:
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:35:04 -0700
Subject: ILC'10 Presentations and Events Schedules
*With the usual apologies to those who receive multiple copies
This version contains the schedules of presentations and tutorial*
*~~~
It works fine. Thank you, Peter.
I didn't recognize this because I used mod_rewrite for reverse proxy.
Daishi
At Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:44:37 +0200,
Peter Bex wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:38:32PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > hm, perhaps this is a silly question (I don't know much about Apach
At Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:23:37 +0200,
Peter Bex wrote:
> > One solution would be to use SGI, which is not ready in chicken4.
>
> Indeed. However, fastcgi is ready. You'd need to drop Spiffy then, though.
Can anybody tell me about fastcgi?
As far as I understand, fastcgi create several processes.
Be
At Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:20:14 +0200,
Peter Bex wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 07:14:30PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> > At Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:11:03 +0200,
> > Peter Bex wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:28:45AM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> > > > Dear Peter,
> > > >
> > > > Another qu
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:38:32PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> hm, perhaps this is a silly question (I don't know much about Apache),
> but have you considered enabling ProxyPreserveHost?
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypreservehost
Since the docs say this should be off us
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:02:02PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> I tell you why, and maybe you have an idea for workaround.
> I've started my project with http-server (or spiffy) as a standalone
> http server, however I now have to run on a server that runs Apache
> and only port 80 is available. Hen
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:02:02PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
>
> > Yeah, that'd just be a simple wrapper layer around it.
>
> It's incomplete. I just wanted to ask you if it's
> something valuable to others.
I don't really need this, but Felix has said he liked the old
way, so maybe he likes thi
At Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:24:10 +0200,
Peter Bex wrote:
> > raw-handler.scm
> > ; handler to emulate chicken3-style request-handler
>
> [..code snipped..]
>
> I don't know, but that doesn't look complete.
> Yeah, that'd just be a simple wrapper layer around it.
It's incomplete. I just wanted t
At Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:11:03 +0200,
Peter Bex wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:28:45AM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> > Dear Peter,
> >
> > Another question regarding with chicken3->chicken4 porting.
> > I used the http-server-form-posts egg to handle multipart/form-data,
> > but the egg is not
At Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:10:36 +0200,
Peter Bex wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:22:22AM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> > > Yes, this is uglier. There are several different request handling
> > > eggs now though! They make it easier to handle incoming requests.
> >
> > Is it that ugly?
> > None
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 07:14:30PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> At Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:11:03 +0200,
> Peter Bex wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:28:45AM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> > > Dear Peter,
> > >
> > > Another question regarding with chicken3->chicken4 porting.
> > > I used the http
_/_/_/ _/_/_/
_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/
_/_/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/
_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/
--[ I
Hi
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:20:14 +0200 Peter Bex wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 07:14:30PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
>> At Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:11:03 +0200,
>> Peter Bex wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:28:45AM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
>> > > Dear Peter,
>> > >
>> > > Another questio
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 08:13:35PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
> > I'm confused; do you think the eggs are lower-level than your code, or
> > do you think the spiffy code itself is low-level, or what?
>
> OK, I meant:
> a) chicken3/http-server was low level so that I can write my handler.
> b) chick
14 matches
Mail list logo
