Quoth Peter Danenberg on Pungenday, the 59th of Bureaucracy:
> [C]an we revert to the old behaviour, or can I revert locally by
> using `set-read-syntax!'?
Fortunately or unfortunately, this hideous hack suffices to bring back
the 4.5.0 behaviour without permanently modifying the global
read-table
In 4.5.0, this sufficed to create a backslash symbol:
'\
whereas in 4.6.0, we need:
'\\
This change screws up a scheme->latex transformer I had written,
unfortunately; can we revert to the old behaviour, or can I revert
locally by using `set-read-syntax!'?
_
Hi
I'm confused about the `require' semantics for compiled and
interpreted code and regarding to CHICKEN_INCLUDE_PATH. Here's
an example:
$ pwd
/home/mario/tmp/load
$ ls -l
total 4
-rw-r--r-- 1 mario mario 11 Out 5 09:38 a.scm
drwxr-xr-x 2 mario mario 120 Out 5 09:48 subdir
$ cat a.scm
(