Re: [Chicken-users] Backslash-symbol changed from \ to \\ between 4.5.0 and 4.6.0

2010-10-05 Thread Peter Danenberg
Quoth Peter Danenberg on Pungenday, the 59th of Bureaucracy: > [C]an we revert to the old behaviour, or can I revert locally by > using `set-read-syntax!'? Fortunately or unfortunately, this hideous hack suffices to bring back the 4.5.0 behaviour without permanently modifying the global read-table

[Chicken-users] Backslash-symbol changed from \ to \\ between 4.5.0 and 4.6.0

2010-10-05 Thread Peter Danenberg
In 4.5.0, this sufficed to create a backslash symbol: '\ whereas in 4.6.0, we need: '\\ This change screws up a scheme->latex transformer I had written, unfortunately; can we revert to the old behaviour, or can I revert locally by using `set-read-syntax!'? _

[Chicken-users] CHICKEN_INCLUDE_PATH and require

2010-10-05 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi I'm confused about the `require' semantics for compiled and interpreted code and regarding to CHICKEN_INCLUDE_PATH. Here's an example: $ pwd /home/mario/tmp/load $ ls -l total 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 mario mario 11 Out 5 09:38 a.scm drwxr-xr-x 2 mario mario 120 Out 5 09:48 subdir $ cat a.scm (