Hi Ivan,
Here'a another bug:
(totally unsure what's going on).
#;15> ((make-format-textdiff 'context) (current-output-port)(textdiff
(with-input-from-string "\n\nAlthough there's basically no entry point,\nhere
is some useful pointers.\n\n\nFiler (without login)\nFiler (with
login)\nWaitleSQL\
Hi,
It seems I wrote too soon about getting images showing in the wiki. The URL
is correct, but, when trying from another computer, I am asked to enter the
repository password to see the images.
Is there any way around this?
thanks,
Peter.
On 5 December 2010 12:51, Peter Bex wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:18:49PM -0500, David Dreisigmeyer wrote:
> Thank you Alan and Peter - that took care of it.
>
> csc is also complaining about, e.g., int32_t , uint , uint64_t ,
> __attribute__ and
>
> #define CL_API_SUFFIX__VERSION_1_0 AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_6_AND_LATER
The p
Thank you Alan and Peter - that took care of it.
csc is also complaining about, e.g., int32_t , uint , uint64_t ,
__attribute__ and
#define CL_API_SUFFIX__VERSION_1_0 AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_6_AND_LATER
If I change, e.g., int32_t to int, uint64_t to unsigned long int
things work out -- n
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:15:32PM -0500, David Dreisigmeyer wrote:
> I'm getting the following error for the attached cl.scm file (OpenCL
> 1.0 on OS X 10.6):
>
> $ csc -s -o cl.so cl.scm -framework OpenCL -framework Accelerate
> Warning: (line 205) unterminated here-doc string literal `EOF'
> Er
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:15:32PM -0500, David Dreisigmeyer wrote:
> I'm getting the following error for the attached cl.scm file (OpenCL
> 1.0 on OS X 10.6):
>
> $ csc -s -o cl.so cl.scm -framework OpenCL -framework Accelerate
> Warning: (line 205) unterminated here-doc string literal `EOF'
> Er
I'm getting the following error for the attached cl.scm file (OpenCL
1.0 on OS X 10.6):
$ csc -s -o cl.so cl.scm -framework OpenCL -framework Accelerate
Warning: (line 205) unterminated here-doc string literal `EOF'
Error: (line 205) unterminated list, starting in line 19
Error: shell command term
I have a question about commit
c157ff502829c6f2856df4a963d81a88ee241ebf, the change for detecting
cycles in equal?
The last change in runtime.c is as follows:
@@ -3865,7 +3876,8 @@ C_regparm C_word C_fcall C_equalp(C_word x, C_word y)
C_header header;
C_word bits, n, i;
- C_stack_check
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:15:02PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
> == 3. Chicken Talk
>
> Readers of issue 11 may remember the T-DOSE picture gallery
> (http://www.call-cc.org/pictures/t-dose2010/index.html). Be informed
> that it now contains a few additional pictures, some of which are
> quite o
_/_/_/ _/_/_/
_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/
_/_/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/
_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/
--[ I
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:56:36 +0100 (CET), hartrumpf wrote:
> #! /usr/local/bin/csi -:d -script
> (write (command-line-arguments))
>
> - no change and no additional output.
Sorry, the output did change to:
[panic] illegal runtime option - execution terminated
From: Sven Hartrumpf
Subject: [Chicken-users] chicken script with many CLI arguments
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:43:10 +0100 (CET)
> Hi all.
>
> I am trying to call a chicken script with many command line
> arguments (over 1 file names).
I think the runtime system tries to allocate he storage
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:49:36 -0500 (EST), felix wrote:
> If you add "-:d" before that, what is shown?
If you mean the following
#! /usr/local/bin/csi -:d -script
(write (command-line-arguments))
- no change and no additional output.
___
Chicken-users mai
From: Sven Hartrumpf
Subject: [Chicken-users] chicken script with many CLI arguments
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:43:10 +0100 (CET)
> Hi all.
>
> I am trying to call a chicken script with many command line
> arguments (over 1 file names).
If you add "-:d" before that, what is shown?
cheers,
Hi all.
I am trying to call a chicken script with many command line
arguments (over 1 file names).
This is a minimal example script:
bugch1.scm:
-
#! /usr/local/bin/csi -script
(write (command-line-arguments))
-
> bugch1.scm *
This is what I was hoping to do today, or soon.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 09:45:50PM -0500, David Dreisigmeyer wrote:
>> In case anyones interested here's a working example of some OpenCL
>> code. I'm hoping to pursue this line a bit more, but wan
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 09:45:50PM -0500, David Dreisigmeyer wrote:
> In case anyones interested here's a working example of some OpenCL
> code. I'm hoping to pursue this line a bit more, but wanted to verify
> it could work easily.
I see a C program which happens to be invoked from Chicken.
That
17 matches
Mail list logo