Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:16:43 +0100 (CET) Felix wrote: > From: Mario Domenech Goulart > Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette! > Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:10:32 -0500 > >> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:09:01 +0100 (CET) Felix >> wrote: >> >>> BTW, perhaps we should make some room in the egg

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Alaric Snell-Pym
On 02/17/11 14:33, Alex Shinn wrote: > Or replace every use of sed and awk with perl, which > is consistent across all platforms and scales better. However, as I think most of the people likely to run this code will have chicken installed and know Scheme, why not do it in Chicken? I believe someb

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Felix
From: Mario Domenech Goulart Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette! Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:10:32 -0500 > On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:09:01 +0100 (CET) Felix > wrote: > >> BTW, perhaps we should make some room in the egg repo for this >> work. > > Maybe under the gazette dir? > Why not

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:09:01 +0100 (CET) Felix wrote: > BTW, perhaps we should make some room in the egg repo for this > work. Maybe under the gazette dir? > If nobody objects, I can do the svn log parsing. Great! Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario _

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Felix
BTW, perhaps we should make some room in the egg repo for this work. If nobody objects, I can do the svn log parsing. cheers, felix ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Felix
From: Andy Bennett Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette! Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:32:44 + Whoa. Thanks, Andy! cheers, felix ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Andy Bennett [110217 17:36]: > Hi, > > > Super special bonus point: > > > > 5) Write a script that, given a date range, parses the mailing list > > archive into wiki markup for a list of links to the posts in the > > archive, along with links to the user's pages as per (4), grouped by thread.

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Andy Bennett
Hi, > Super special bonus point: > > 5) Write a script that, given a date range, parses the mailing list > archive into wiki markup for a list of links to the posts in the > archive, along with links to the user's pages as per (4), grouped by thread. The attached script will process the web-base

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Alex Shinn
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:51 PM, John Cowan wrote: > Andy Bennett scripsit: > >> Strange! The first part of the first sed is supposed to remove the '*' >> that indicates the currently checked out branch. > > The meaning of the regex /^*/ is implementation-dependent: it can be > read as "remove an

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread John Cowan
Andy Bennett scripsit: > Strange! The first part of the first sed is supposed to remove the '*' > that indicates the currently checked out branch. The meaning of the regex /^*/ is implementation-dependent: it can be read as "remove any number of hats, including zero" or "remove a star at the begi

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Andy Bennett
Alaric Snell-Pym wrote: > On 02/16/11 15:04, Andy Bennett wrote: > >> This bash command, executed inside a git repo, should do the trick: >> >> - >> for b in `git branch -a --no-color | sed -e 's/^*//' -e >> 's/^\s*\(\S*\).*/\1/'` ; do echo " * On `echo $b | sed -e >> 's#^remotes/##'`:"; git l

Re: [Chicken-users] Save the Gazette!

2011-02-17 Thread Felix
> > Agreed! Excellent! > > I've outlined what I think would be good; of course, partial > implementations ("I did X but Y is too hard") are a step in the right > direction, and somebody else might do Y later, too :-) Every little helps! Could you, once again, list the necessary parts and put t