Hello,
one more improvement to the SRFI-99 implementation: I've added a
srfi-99-variants module with syntactic sugar for the definition and
destructuring of variant types where the base type is an empty record
and the variants are sealed subtypes.
Ciao,
Thomas
--
When C++ is your hammer, every
I need to pick up the text (field prompts and data) from a data entry
screen. Is there a utility which could do such? An array of text by
rows would be preferable, but other formats would likely suffice.
Thanks, Steve
___
Chicken-users mailing list
From: Thomas Chust
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:51:06 +0200
> Hello,
>
> one more improvement to the SRFI-99 implementation: I've added a
> srfi-99-variants module with syntactic sugar for the definition and
> destructuring of vari
Felix scripsit:
> When will it be turing-complete?
Substring and string-concat are already Turing-complete, along with
the usual syntax primitives.
--
Her he asked if O'Hare Doctor tidings sent from far John Cowan
coast and she with grameful sigh him answered that http://ccil.org/~cowa
From: Thomas Chust
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:51:06 +0200
> Hello,
>
> one more improvement to the SRFI-99 implementation: I've added a
> srfi-99-variants module with syntactic sugar for the definition and
> destructuring of vari
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Steve Graham
wrote:
> I need to pick up the text (field prompts and data) from a data entry
> screen. Is there a utility which could do such? An array of text by
> rows would be preferable, but other formats would likely suffice.
I'm afraid
Okay.
Here's the situation. A group at work is already entering data into a
Windows-based application. Now they are also supposed to be putting in much
the same data into a 2nd terminal-based app.
So, I'm thinking there must be a way to pick up the data already entered into
the first app (i.
Am Freitag, 16. September 2011 schrieb Felix :
> [...]
> BTW, would it be possible that you document the extensions in the
> srfi-99 wiki page?
Hello,
I added a brief description of everything in the egg to the corresponding
wiki page. Links to the official SRFI-99 document and the documentatio