Hello everyone,
This is just a friendly reminder that Chicken will again be represented
at this year's T-DOSE (Technical Dutch Open Source Event) in Eindhoven,
the Netherlands. It's in the weekend of 5 and 6 November.
The organisation has recently released the schedule of talks at
On Oct 5 2011, Christian Kellermann wrote:
Hi Christian,
Dear Jörg,
* Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [111005 22:29]:
While I've been following this valgrind hint I ran into some
code in C_a_i_string_to_number ... as expectable this code
is kinda complicated since the
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 12:47:25PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
On Oct 5 2011, Christian Kellermann wrote:
Today I re-read the R5RS, which left me wondering. Would it be
#bi101010.1 or whould it be #b#i101010.1 ?
The latter. See the Lexical Syntax section, it has these productions:
Hi, folks. When I try to run a parallel build of chicken 4.7.0 via:
gmake -j4 PLATFORM=bsd
... it eventually fails saying this:
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libchicken.so \
-o libchicken.so library.o eval.o data-structures.o ports.o files.o
extras.o lolevel.o utils.o tcp.o srfi-1.o
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 15:37:08 +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
--- rules.make.orig 2011-10-06 14:50:00.0 +0300
+++ rules.make2011-10-06 14:50:06.0 +0300
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@
# import libraries and extensions
-%.so: %.o
+%.so: %.o $(PRIMARY_LIBCHICKEN)
Hi Vitaly,
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:37:08 +0300 Vitaly Magerya vmage...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, folks. When I try to run a parallel build of chicken 4.7.0 via:
gmake -j4 PLATFORM=bsd
... it eventually fails saying this:
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libchicken.so \
-o libchicken.so library.o
Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
This issue has been addressed by http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/526
OK, I see.
Any news on that bug? Will the fix be committed any time soon?
(I maintain the FreeBSD port for chicken, and some people are asking
why is it that the port doesn't build in parallel
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:24:36 +0300 Vitaly Magerya vmage...@gmail.com wrote:
Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
This issue has been addressed by http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/526
OK, I see.
Any news on that bug? Will the fix be committed any time soon?
(I maintain the FreeBSD port for chicken,
Hallo,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart
mario.goul...@gmail.com wrote:
We'd be changing a critical part that works just for the sake of
speeding up a process that is rarely executed (the build process).
It's not so rare when you are developing Chicken itself.
--
-alex
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:44:26 +0200 Alex Queiroz asand...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart
mario.goul...@gmail.com wrote:
We'd be changing a critical part that works just for the sake of
speeding up a process that is rarely executed (the build
On Oct 6 2011, Peter Bex wrote:
Furthermore:
Also I changed my mind: I'm afraid numbers in Scheme are complex
enough to use a real parser to read them.
I agree. There's pure Scheme code for parsing numbers syntax in trunk
of the numbers egg (and the latest release has it too). It's not
The problem is that the build system is a critical part of CHICKEN and
it has to be extensively tested on all platforms. Testing it is a bit
hard, since even if make is finished successfully, it doesn't
necessarily means that CHICKEN was built correctly.
Very well. What is the proper
Hi Vitaly,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:45:40 +0300 Vitaly Magerya vmage...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that the build system is a critical part of CHICKEN and
it has to be extensively tested on all platforms. Testing it is a bit
hard, since even if make is finished successfully, it doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2011 06:12 PM, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
We have a chroot environment for Linux
(http://wiki.call-cc.org/playground) which contains libraries required
to build most of eggs. It is the same environment as used by
On 06/10/11 10:31 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:24:36 +0300 Vitaly Mageryavmage...@gmail.com wrote:
Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
This issue has been addressed by http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/526
OK, I see.
Any news on that bug? Will the fix be committed any
15 matches
Mail list logo
