On 10/11/11 11:47 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
Toby,
On Nov 10, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
3) It's really sad to see 25% CPU utilisation on this quad-CPU system
throughout the long build. Is the parallel make patch coming? :)
The patch in ticket 526
(http://bugs.call-cc.org/raw-attachmen
Toby,
On Nov 10, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
> 3) It's really sad to see 25% CPU utilisation on this quad-CPU system
> throughout the long build. Is the parallel make patch coming? :)
The patch in ticket 526
(http://bugs.call-cc.org/raw-attachment/ticket/526/parallel-build-2.diff.txt)
On 09/11/11 6:48 AM, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
Hello Chickeners,
today I tried to compile the latest stable Chicken, 4.7.0.3-st on
Solaris 10 (sparc), only to find out the the build fails: I used
gmake PLATFORM=SunOS PREFIX=$HOME
As invited my mario-goulart, I tried this on a fairly old
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:34:24 +0900 Nicolas Pelletier
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 20:05, Mario Domenech Goulart
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:10:10 +0900 Nicolas Pelletier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Note on the /bin/true part: README is lying ;-) There is no bootstrap
>>> compiler included
Hello Mario,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 20:05, Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:10:10 +0900 Nicolas Pelletier
> wrote:
>
>> Note on the /bin/true part: README is lying ;-) There is no bootstrap
>> compiler included in the stable releases (1st lie), and there i
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:10:10 +0900 Nicolas Pelletier
wrote:
> Note on the /bin/true part: README is lying ;-) There is no bootstrap
> compiler included in the stable releases (1st lie), and there is no
> pre-compiled bootstrap compiler to be downloaded from the Chicken site
> (2nd l
* Nicolas Pelletier [10 12:10]:
> Note on the /bin/true part: README is lying ;-) There is no bootstrap
> compiler included in the stable releases (1st lie), and there is no
> pre-compiled bootstrap compiler to be downloaded from the Chicken site
> (2nd lie). But thankfully the .c files are al
Hello John,
Thank you for your suggestions. Here is the next episode of my sparc
adventures...
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 00:36, John Cowan wrote:
>
> Currently, sparc is not a supported CPU. The first thing is to add it
> to the list of known CPU architectures. Add the line
>
> sparc) ech
