On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Vok Vojwo wrote:
> 2011/12/7 Peter Bex :
>>
>> Actually, the main reason is that SSAX is a horrible mess which has
>> many completely unrelated procedures all mixed together.
>> There are several egg that provide different sets of procedures
>> from the SSAX project
2011/12/7 Jim Ursetto :
>
> Other ways were to regularize and improve some of the identifier names, make
> things more idiomatic, and in sxml-serializer's case, add some feature
> enhancements.
Where is the improvement? Writing sxml-serializer instead of
srl:sxml->xml does not make much differen
2011/12/7 Peter Bex :
>
> Actually, the main reason is that SSAX is a horrible mess which has
> many completely unrelated procedures all mixed together.
> There are several egg that provide different sets of procedures
> from the SSAX project. Most eggs include all files from the SSAX
> project to
On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
> Actually, the main reason is that SSAX is a horrible mess which has
> many completely unrelated procedures all mixed together.
> There are several egg that provide different sets of procedures
> from the SSAX project. Most eggs include all files fro
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:35:37PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote:
> > Why is it not included if it is there?
> >
> > Or why is there an sxml-serializer egg if the code is already part of
> > the SSAX libs, which is part of the sxpath egg?
>
> As I understood the egg is just a wrapper around t
* Vok Vojwo [111207 17:32]:
> 2011/12/7 Vok Vojwo :
> >
> > I was looking for the srl:sxml->xml function:
> > http://modis.ispras.ru/Lizorkin/Apidoc/index.html#docfunc15826
> >
>
> I got it. I had to include "sxml-tools/serializer.scm" in
> sxpath-lolevel.scm. After that it is possible to export
2011/12/7 Vok Vojwo :
>
> I was looking for the srl:sxml->xml function:
> http://modis.ispras.ru/Lizorkin/Apidoc/index.html#docfunc15826
>
I got it. I had to include "sxml-tools/serializer.scm" in
sxpath-lolevel.scm. After that it is possible to export srl:sxml->xml.
And it seems to work:
(displa
2011/12/7 Peter Bex :
>
> Try this instead:
>
> csi -R sxpath-lolevel -e "(print (sxml:sxml->xml '()))"
>
Thanks. This works but not as expected ;-)
I was looking for the srl:sxml->xml function:
http://modis.ispras.ru/Lizorkin/Apidoc/index.html#docfunc15826
Is it also available?
___
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:47:03PM +0100, Vok Vojwo wrote:
> The documentation of the sxpath egg describes the sxml:sxml->xml
> function. But when I try to call it, I get an error:
It's mentioned under the heading "sxpath-lolevel". This is a separate
module that you need to load.
> csi -R sxpath
* Vok Vojwo [111207 16:47]:
> The documentation of the sxpath egg describes the sxml:sxml->xml
> function. But when I try to call it, I get an error:
>
> csi -R sxpath -e "(display (sxml:sxml->xml '()))"
>
> Error: unbound variable: sxml:sxml->xml
It should be part of sxpath-lolevel. The follow
Hi Vok,
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:47:03 +0100 Vok Vojwo wrote:
> The documentation of the sxpath egg describes the sxml:sxml->xml
> function. But when I try to call it, I get an error:
>
> csi -R sxpath -e "(display (sxml:sxml->xml '()))"
>
> Error: unbound variable: sxml:sxml->xml
>
> Call
The documentation of the sxpath egg describes the sxml:sxml->xml
function. But when I try to call it, I get an error:
csi -R sxpath -e "(display (sxml:sxml->xml '()))"
Error: unbound variable: sxml:sxml->xml
Call history:
sxml-tools/xpath-parser.scm:1354: txp:param-value
12 matches
Mail list logo
