Alan Post scripsit:
> (pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
You're assuming that the result of amb is an "amb object" that you
can bind to a variable, but that's not how amb works. It provides
a non-linear flow of control in the evaluation of its arguments, but
once it termina
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 18:23 -0600, Alan Post wrote:
> [...]
> (pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
> [...]
> produces:
> [...]
> (0)
> [...]
Hello,
to me this behaviour looks correct. amb-collect is supposed to collect
all the different values its argument can take on, but i
I'm confused by the following behavior in the amb egg:
(require-extension extras amb)
(pretty-print (amb-collect (amb 0 1 2)))
(pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
(exit)
produces:
(0 1 2)
(0)
I would expect both forms to produce (0 1 2).
What am I missing? I'm
Hi Mark,
* Mark Carter [120314 09:09]:
> I'm getting a segfault with srfi-34:
>
> $ csi
>
> CHICKEN
> (c)2008-2011 The Chicken Team
> (c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
> Version 4.7.0.5-st
> linux-unix-gnu-x86 [ manyargs dload ptables ]
> compiled 2012-03-07 on miro (Linux)
>
> #;1> (use srfi-
I'm getting a segfault with srfi-34:
$ csi
CHICKEN
(c)2008-2011 The Chicken Team
(c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
Version 4.7.0.5-st
linux-unix-gnu-x86 [ manyargs dload ptables ]
compiled 2012-03-07 on miro (Linux)
#;1> (use srfi-34)
; loading /home/mcarter/.local/lib/chicken/6/srfi-34.import.s
