>>
> Now I understand what you mean about parameter-like
> procedures. Supporting them does indeed make the situation more
> challenging. But, if we could somehow distinguish between real
> parameters and parameter-like procedures, we could be sure to only
> send the "bypass guard/conversion proced
From: Matt Gushee
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] What is the purpose of module interfaces?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:36:02 -0600
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Felix <
> fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org> wrote:
>
>
>> Would you perhaps like to help us with this by extending this manua
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Felix <
fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org> wrote:
> Would you perhaps like to help us with this by extending this manual
> section a little? You could take that queue example as a starting
> point and explain things alongside the code. That would be nice, a
Hi.
I've been toying with the mailbox egg. AFAIK there's currently no way to
wait messages from multiple mailboxes at the same time.
Is there a reason this is not supported?
I made a quick hack that seems to not break immediately. There's a new
procedure `mailbox-receive-many!' that takes a list
