Felix scripsit:
> Very good - thanks a lot! I'll give this a try. Should we simply replace
> the serialization or do you think it would make sense to let the user
> choose a serialization mechanism for suspensions?
Given the advantages of PBs, I'd just move to them for all applications of
seriali
> yes, I'm aware of suspension and the magic going on inside that egg is
> precisely what I referred to by "fiddling around with green threads".
>
> In fact, protobuf can easily act as a drop-in replacement for s11n and I
> just verified that it does work just fine with suspensions! So I can say
>
Hi,
> Note that there is http://wiki.call-cc.org/events already.
Gha! I searched for the events and none of them came up in the search
results.
Regards,
@ndy
--
andy...@ashurst.eu.org
http://www.ashurst.eu.org/
0x7EBA75FF
___
Chicken-users maili
On Thu, 30 May 2013 14:43:47 +0100 Andy Bennett wrote:
>>> CHICKEN U.S. San Francisco? :-)
>>
>> Seriously though I would be glad to organize a San Fransisco CHICKEN
>> if a few people are interested.
>
> There's nothing like a bit of gamification to encourage things so I've
> taken the liberty
Hi,
>> CHICKEN U.S. San Francisco? :-)
>
> Seriously though I would be glad to organize a San Fransisco CHICKEN
> if a few people are interested.
There's nothing like a bit of gamification to encourage things so I've
taken the liberty of pulling together a leaderboard of all the meetups
that I c
Thanks Sven and Peter, the make and install and check targets all finish
without errors with -O3 under gcc 4.7.1!
/jl
> > Could you try whether "make check" on a -O3-compiled CHICKEN succeeds
> > with the attached patch?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Peter
--
ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Michele La Monaca
wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Michele La Monaca
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Patrick Li
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Michele,
>>>
>>> I realized after posting my version of named-let*, that you actually
>>> *cannot* use it to
