Re: [Chicken-users] Lowdown & sxml-serializer not working together

2013-08-23 Thread Matt Gushee
Hello again-- Well, I'm running into a new problem with SRV:send-reply. By following the documentation, I managed to create a rule set that escaped problem characters i the manner I want. But now, working with the complete document, I discover that some of the non-element nodes are not handled pro

Re: [Chicken-users] New post(s) about CHICKEN

2013-08-23 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hey Tim! On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 19:25:05 +0200 Tim van der Linden wrote: > I just though it would be nice to do some shameless self promotion and > let you guys and gals know I have just released the first chapter > about CHICKEN on my blog over at shisaa.jp. > > It will span around three chapters

[Chicken-users] New post(s) about CHICKEN

2013-08-23 Thread Tim van der Linden
Hi all I just though it would be nice to do some shameless self promotion and let you guys and gals know I have just released the first chapter about CHICKEN on my blog over at shisaa.jp. It will span around three chapters and aims to be a beginners guide to CHICKEN (and thus Scheme). Target a

Re: [Chicken-users] ANN: eping

2013-08-23 Thread Michele La Monaca
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Michele La Monaca wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:39 PM, John Cowan wrote: >> Michele La Monaca scripsit: > > (define-syntax bound? > (syntax-rules () > ((_ exp) (handle-exceptions exn #f (atom? exp) #t The macro above has an useless atom? call and