On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:54:17 +0400 Oleg Kolosov wrote:
> On 02/04/14 19:13, John Cowan wrote:
>> What do you think of my idea of dropping even GNU make for MSVC support
>> and just compiling everything with a batch file? One thing I note is
>> that MSVC's C compiler is C89 only; do we have depe
On 02/04/14 19:13, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Bex scripsit:
>
>> This looks very useful indeed. Is the documentation for CMake better
>> nowadays? I seem to recall that was the main reason we dropped CMake,
>> because nobody besides one person understood it well enough to maintain
>> the build.
>
Peter Bex scripsit:
> This looks very useful indeed. Is the documentation for CMake better
> nowadays? I seem to recall that was the main reason we dropped CMake,
> because nobody besides one person understood it well enough to maintain
> the build.
That was part of it. In addition, CMake was
On 02/04/14 12:08, Peter Bex wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> This looks very useful indeed. Is the documentation for CMake better
> nowadays? I seem to recall that was the main reason we dropped CMake,
> because nobody besides one person understood it well enough to maintain
> the build.
I don't know how i
Hi Matt,
Did you manage to compile canvas-draw on windows in the end? Strangely I
encounter a different error (I'm missing cd.h, I don't know why yet).
install order:
("canvas-draw")
installing canvas-draw:1.1.1 ...
changing current directory to
C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp/temp9506.5656/
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 03:40:35AM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
> On 02/03/14 21:53, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> > I don't know. Unless the installer drags a C toolchain as a runtime
> > dependency, I don't see how it would make CHICKEN more interesting on
> > Windows for developers (unless you
