On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:46:57PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
Regardless, I'll add a utility to make defining tests with your
own comparator easier, and explicitly export test-approx-equal?
so you don't have to capture the initial test comparator.
While you're looking at that, could you also
Peter Bex scripsit:
While you're looking at that, could you also take a look at this ticket?
https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/935
In addition, the page on comparing floats that you pointed to now has a
replacement:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:33 PM, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
Peter Bex scripsit:
While you're looking at that, could you also take a look at this ticket?
https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/935
That was from 22 months ago... I don't remember
exactly when it was fixed but it works
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:00:00PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:33 PM, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
Peter Bex scripsit:
While you're looking at that, could you also take a look at this ticket?
https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/935
That was from 22
On 29/07/14 04:58, Alex Shinn wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:09 PM, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org
mailto:co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
Alex Shinn scripsit:
If people think it's useful I'd consider walking pairs and vectors.
They are the most important cases, because the
Hi Caolan,
thanks for the egg, much needed addition (though I would like to see
it in the posix module rather than a separate egg). I used to
workaround (the lack of) it through ##sys#glob-regexp which is
another function I would like to be explicitly supported in core.
A few suggestions if you
