On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:27:36PM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote: > I was building a new blog with Coq au vin, which uses Civet to process > templates, which in turn uses SSAX ... and one of my XHTML templates caused > [an] error.
[error elided] > Now that's a helpful error message. It turns out the problem was the inline > JavaScript in my template (which contained the <= operator). Since I was > using the XHTML Transitional doctype, that's allowed per W3C specs, and it > simply hadn't occurred to me that it was likely to result in > non-well-formed XML. You shouldn't parse HTML with an XML parser. Since you're using CHICKEN, you could try the html-parser CHICKEN egg, which is more permissive. I *think* XHTML Strict is a proper XML application, but I'm not 100% sure, so if you insist on strict error checking you could use the strict doctype. However, of course that won't make much of a difference with regards to using an XML parser to parse it; you'd get the same error. Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
