And thanks to your feedback the branch is now passing the available
tests.
Turns out that (syntax) was allowing the two-modules-in-one-file thing
to work. Taking that out caused... Problems. ;)
--
-Dan Leslie
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-us
First off, thank-you for the aid!
Peter Bex writes:
> I'm sorry to say it, but this egg contains a lot of strange mistakes and
> weird things; for example, the setup-file tries to emit a module named
> "funky", which does not exist. Also, the renaming procedure from
> explicit renaming macro t
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 08:01:29AM -0700, Dan Leslie wrote:
> Here's the wierdness: this works magnificently in CSI, but fails in CSC.
>
> Moreover, if I replace /m! with a broken variant then /m works great in
> both CSI and CSC! I know, it doesn't make much sense to me either. My
> best guess is
Hello, chickeneers--
As a by-product of my recent adventure in packaging Chicken for Windows, I
discovered MSYS2.
MSYS2 is an updated version of the venerable MSYS, with 64-bit support and
an optional MinGW environment, ported from mingw-w64. It offers a large
selection of packages, uses the Pacm
> The incorrect code that CSC allows other things to work on:
This should have stated CSI.
-Dan
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Dan Leslie wrote:
>
> Hi Chickeners!
>
> Around two weeks ago I received a bug report that the monad egg wasn't
> working in CSC. This turned out to be the result of
Hi Chickeners!
Around two weeks ago I received a bug report that the monad egg wasn't
working in CSC. This turned out to be the result of a syntax error, and
though I've greatly simplified the syntax and narrowed the issue
considerably, I find myself stuck in a corner while surrounded by wet
pain
Hi,
(Sorry for my English)
Newbie with Scheme, i try to use the termbox egg.
It seems me a very nice and cool library and the documentation helps me
a lot.
I am learning Scheme and appreciate Chicken implementation.
Here a little piece of code to print a simple text menu.
But this code isn't i
