Hello Jeronimo,
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:30:28 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> So, I have packaged PLL ("Programming in Logic in Lisp") [1].
>
> PLL is a set of implementations of Prolog in Scheme. It is not supposed
> to be efficient, but rather as a simple way to teach the fundamentals of
> L
Hello!
So, I have packaged PLL ("Programming in Logic in Lisp") [1].
PLL is a set of implementations of Prolog in Scheme. It is not supposed
to be efficient, but rather as a simple way to teach the fundamentals of
Logic Programming and the internal working of a Prolog interpreter
(conceptually on
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:28:38AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> On 2016-02-21 15:21, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> > (compile -X r7rs -R r7rs -s -O2 "pll.scm" -unit pll)
> > (compile -X r7rs -R r7rs -s -O2 "pll.import.scm" -unit pll)
>
> You shouldn't use "-unit pll" here. That's what's c
On 2016-02-21 15:21, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> (compile -X r7rs -R r7rs -s -O2 "pll.scm" -unit pll)
> (compile -X r7rs -R r7rs -s -O2 "pll.import.scm" -unit pll)
You shouldn't use "-unit pll" here. That's what's causing the error, and
in this simple case where you're compiling a more
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 07:55:49PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Jeronimo Pellegrini scripsit:
>
> > If you believe this would be interesting as an egg, tell me and I'll
> > get it packaged!
>
> Nice! You should also compare it with Schelog. Definitely do package
> it as an egg.
Ok, I have done