With Kon Lovett's permission, I just finished porting his SRFI-45 egg to
Chicken 5, and would like to submit it for publication.
Its documentation is here: [1]
Its release-info is here: [2]
and test-new-egg gave it a clean bill of health.
--Sergey
[1] -
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 20:02:12 -0500
John Cowan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 5:51 PM Chris Vine wrote:
> >On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:20:04 +0100
> >"Jörg F. Wittenberger" wrote:
> > > This approach is bound to fail badly.
> > >
> > > It works just as long as there are a) no exceptions raised in
On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 5:51 PM Chris Vine wrote:
> For my elucidation, why? The indentation of the code isn't ideal but
> the whole purpose of dynamic-wind is to handle code leaving the thunk in
> case of exception, application of a continuation object or regular
> return.
>
You're right
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:20:04 +0100
"Jörg F. Wittenberger" wrote:
> Am Thu, 05 Nov 2020 23:22:09 +0100
> schrieb Fredrik Appelberg :
>
> > 3. I'm new to dynamic-wind. If I wanted to create a general form for
> >executing a thunk protected by a mutex, would this be a good idea?
> >
> >
On Sat, 07 Nov 2020 12:58:33 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote:
> I've just ported SRFI-111: Boxes, and would like so submit it for publication.
>
> Its documentation is here: [1]
>
> Its release-info is here: [2]
>
> test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health.
>
> Although there was a "box"
I've just ported SRFI-111: Boxes, and would like so submit it for publication.
Its documentation is here: [1]
Its release-info is here: [2]
test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health.
Although there was a "box" egg for Chicken 4, which was listed on the
"Supported Standards" page as
On Sat, 07 Nov 2020 08:48:38 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote:
> I would like to submit a new egg, SRFI-171: Transducers, for
> publication.
>
> Its documentation is here: [1]
>
> Its release-info is here: [2]
>
> and test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health.
>
> --Sergey
>
> [1] -
I would like to submit a new egg, SRFI-171: Transducers, for
publication.
Its documentation is here: [1]
Its release-info is here: [2]
and test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health.
--Sergey
[1] - https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-171
[2] -
By the way, I've set up a git repo where I've put the org file from
which I generate the "Chicken SRFI Support" wiki page (via the
intermediate HTML export) here:
https://github.com/diamond-lizard/chicken-srfi-support
On Thu 05 Nov 2020 06:33:58 PM -08, noosph...@mailc.net wrote:
> First,
On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 20:48:00 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote:
> I just ported SRFI-60 (Integers as Bits) from Chicken 4 to 5 and would
> like to submit it for publication.
>
> Its documentation can be found here: [1]
>
> Its release-info is here: [2]
>
> and test-new-egg gives is a clean bill of
On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 18:03:05 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote:
> I would like to submit a new egg for publication:
>
> SRFI-130: Cursor-based string library
>
> The documentation is here: [1]
>
> The release-info is here: [2]
>
> and test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health.
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
