On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:15:14 -0700 Duke Normandin wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100
> Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>
> Hey Mario ...
>
> Thanks for all the help!!
You're welcome!
> [snip]
>
>> If you want to compile CHICKEN from sources, it's a piece of cake
>> on Linux, and doesn't
Hi!,
Does anyone use a source code formatter?
Which one?
thanks!
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100
Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> $ wget
> http://code.call-cc.org/releases/5.2.0/chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ tar
> xzvf chicken-5.2.0.tar.gz $ cd chicken-5.2.0
> $ make PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=$HOME/local/chicken-5.2.0 install
dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ ls
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100
Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
Hey Mario ...
Thanks for all the help!!
[snip]
> If you want to compile CHICKEN from sources, it's a piece of cake
> on Linux, and doesn't depend on much more than what you'd need to
> install eggs. You'll need a C toolchain and
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:12:50 +0200
Lassi Kortela wrote:
> > dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0
> > E: Version '5.2.0' for 'chicken-bin' was not found
>
> 5.2.0 is in Debian Testing and Unstable.
> https://repology.org/project/chicken/versions
Thanks! I'm rusty with 'apt'
Hi Duke,
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:09:37 -0700 Duke Normandin wrote:
> Debian shows only:
>
> dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ apt search chicken
> Sorting... Done
> Full Text Search... Done
> chicken-bin/oldstable 4.11.0-1 amd64
> Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler
>
> dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$
dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0
E: Version '5.2.0' for 'chicken-bin' was not found
5.2.0 is in Debian Testing and Unstable.
https://repology.org/project/chicken/versions
Debian shows only:
dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ apt search chicken
Sorting... Done
Full Text Search... Done
chicken-bin/oldstable 4.11.0-1 amd64
Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler
dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sudo apt install chicken-bin=5.2.0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:37:41 -0700
Duke Normandin wrote:
[snip}
> Haven't tried to get the scheme script working on plain cmd shell.
> I've got Debian installed on my Win10 box. I may learn
> scheme/chicken there!
I have now:
C:\> csi -ss quickrep.scm
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:56:00 +0100
Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
> "Duke Normandin" , 10.01.2021, 05:05:
>
> > Follow-up ...
[snip]
> Write a program echoing its commandline arguments to stdout
> and then feed it with different types of arguments:
>
> csi -ss echo.scm a b A 123 a.*c 'a.*c' "d e f"
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:56:00 +0100
Stefan Schmiedl wrote:
> "Duke Normandin" , 10.01.2021, 05:05:
>
> > Follow-up ...
[snip]
> Write a program echoing its commandline arguments to stdout
> and then feed it with different types of arguments:
>
> csi -ss echo.scm a b A 123 a.*c 'a.*c' "d e f"
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:16:36 + André Sá wrote:
> On 1/10/21 2:51 AM, Duke Normandin wrote:
>> Hello & Happy New Year!
>>
>> I'm new to Chicken Scheme. I've got some exposure to newLISP and
>> Gambit-C. I'm continueing my test-drive of Chicken because it
>> produced the smallest executable
"Duke Normandin" , 10.01.2021, 05:05:
> Follow-up ...
> The code executed without a burp! :-) However ...
c:\>> csi -ss quickrep.scm xyzabcghi
> abxawxcgh
> foonly
> Something went off the rails! The regex did NOT work. The script
> simply spit the input back out. ad it worked, the output
13 matches
Mail list logo
