Sören Tempel writes:
> I initially extracted this code from an ed(1) implementation which I am
> writing atm in R7RS Scheme, which is why the posix-regex code is also
> still R7RS. I suppose it should indeed be possible to get rid of the
> dependency. I will keep this in mind as an enhancement
Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Hi Sören,
Hi Mario,
> Many thanks. Your egg has been added to the coop.
Thanks a lot!
> Regarding documentation: all fine. Some people create it in advance,
> some after the egg gets added. Both are good as long as we eventually
> have some documentation.
Hi Sören,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:55:29 +0100 Sören Tempel
wrote:
> I have written a small library to wrap the regcomp(3), regexec(3), and
> regerror(3) POSIX functions. This allows using strict POSIX Basic
> Regular Expressions (BREs) and Extended Regular Expressions (EREs) from
> CHICKEN
Hello,
I have written a small library to wrap the regcomp(3), regexec(3), and
regerror(3) POSIX functions. This allows using strict POSIX Basic
Regular Expressions (BREs) and Extended Regular Expressions (EREs) from
CHICKEN code. My understanding is that irregex only supports EREs with
PCRE
