the modules.db
file was read-only. Fixing the permissions on that file seems to have
fixed the problem.
--
Hans Nowak
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
am probably doing something wrong, or have the wrong version of
something or another, but what?
Any tips welcome.
Thanks,
--
Hans Nowak
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
flag?
Sorry for your troubles, let's get this sorted out.
Thanks for your reply. The ARCH flag doesn't seem to make a difference,
but I got things to work (sort of, maybe) using Homebrew; see my other
message.
--
Hans Nowak
___
Chicken-users
of Chicken,
download the development version of that egg. Etc.) Maybe there is,
but I am not aware of it? Or is there something else I am
misunderstanding or doing wrong?
Thanks,
--
Hans Nowak
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http
the same error, using Chicken 4.6.0 on Mac OS X 10.5.
Upon successive runs, the values I got were 1293120.171, 1293120.18,
and 1293120.198. Because it goes up a bit every time, I wonder if it
has anything to do with the conversion of a date/time value, or
something similar.
--
Hans Nowak
, or, if that is too verbose, seq-length, etc...?
--
Hans Nowak
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Nicholas Indy Ray wrote:
On 4/16/09, neil.bay...@gmail.com neil.bay...@gmail.com wrote:
First question: For various reasons, I can't switch to chicken 4 any time
soon. But I can't find the eggs for 3.4 etc. Where are they?
Chicken-setup will download the chicken eggs, the ref is here:
William Ramsay wrote:
Does Scheme (and especially Chicken Scheme) offer a way to do optional
and keyed procedure parameters?
I wrote about this a while ago (from a Python perspective, but you'll get the
idea):
http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/13
--Hans
Elf wrote:
gtk bindings are almost done :) thats mostly copying gruntwork.
suggestions:
1) chicken itself: adding flow analysis (ambitious students!)
2) spiffy: get spiffy to production quality. plugins for spiffy.
2a) Lots of examples for Spiffy, and instructions on how to set it up on
Robin Lee Powell wrote:
I've just looked through man perlre fairly carefully and found
nothing like this at all. So I asked the Python regex
documentation:
Python adds an extension syntax to Perl's extension syntax. If
the first character after the question mark is a P, you know
Howdy y'all,
I'm having a bit of trouble getting SSP to work. Most likely I am doing
something wrong, I just don't know what exactly. :-)
I have a file web/blah.ssp with this code from the Spiffy documentation:
htmlbody
ol?scheme (for-each (lambda (i) (printf li~S~% i)) (iota 5))?/ol
br /
This is more of a general Scheme question...
Let's say I have the following definitions:
#;1 (define magic 42)
#;2 (define s '(foo bar ,magic))
Now I want to replace ,magic with its value. If I write this directly with
backquote and unquote, it's easy and straightforward:
#;3 `(foo bar
Mark Fredrickson wrote:
With a high probibility that Chicken users will be coming from other
PLs, I think a series of Chicken for Python Programmers, Chicken for
Ruby Programmers, etc could be very helpful. Where are my hashes? How
do I do string concatenation? Where are my objects? These
Hi,
I am studying Chicken this year (and blogging about it, as some people here
already discovered :-). So far I have been able to figure out most things by
myself (my experience with Scheme is limited, but I'm not a *complete*
beginner), but I still have a few unanswered questions. Maybe
Kon Lovett wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Hans Nowak wrote:
(get-docstring foo)
docstring for foo
Yes, but not with a documented interface. The procedure
'(##sys#decorate-lambda proc pred decorator)' can create arbitrary
decorations for a procedure. Then, '(##sys#lambda-decoration
First of all, thanks to everybody who replied.
Re docstrings: My next question would be, is it possible to add them (e.g. as a
library)? And would it be desirable to do so? Apparently it is already
possible to write code like:
(define (foo x)
docstring for foo
...body...)
It just has
16 matches
Mail list logo
