On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:56:42PM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote:
> 2011/6/13 Jim Pryor :
> > Thanks Thomas and Jim, that looks right. But puzzling enough, I'm still
> > having troubles.
> > [...]
> > ==> Starting package()...
> > [...]
> > make[1]: ***
t `libchicken.so': No such file or directory
But I still did get the second error, and the installation still failed:
./libchicken.so: file not recognized: File truncated
I'll keep poking around but if anyone with closer knowledge
of the makefile has insight into what's goin
picked up in the first build. I saved a build log, in case it would
be useful to look at.
Any suggestions would be gratefully received. Thanks.
--
Jim Pryor
prof...@jimpryor.net
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
; syntax for
cond is already in the base chicken install. I admit I'm not too clear
on the purpose of this srfi-modules egg. I was just confused because
this egg seems to provide a list of SRFIs supported in the base install
but it doesn't include 61, 62, 88, or 46. Perhaps a
ex
ntation at
<http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/srfi-modules>, neglects to provide an
import library for SRFIs 61, 62, 88, yet these are part of my base
install. Perhaps 46 also, though that came in a later version of Chicken
than I have installed.
Hope this is helpful.
--
Jim Pryor
prof...@j
.
I do think it's conceptually helpful to think of lists first in the way
I described, though, and then think of more sophisticated possibilities really
available for Scheme lists afterwards.
--
Jim Pryor
prof...@jimpryor.net
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
d have to express that
explicitly, by boxing the elements inside an Either-type.
--
Jim Pryor
prof...@jimpryor.net
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
ll -p /some/fakeroot/usr
> >
> > This installs all the egg's files underneath an (otherwise empty) fakeroot.
> > If the build step completes successfully, then the packaging system
> > compresses all the files in the fakeroot and wraps it as a binary package.
> > Later, the u
o dump its files. I think this would
> make it easier to keep track of where everything is, especially if some
> extensions install a lot of files.
>
> Alternatively, we could have a "data-path" procedure which works just
> like the "program-path" procedure, ie
in/csc -feature compiling-extension -setup-mode-s -O2 epeg.scm
`epeg-config --cflags` `epeg-config --libs` -j epeg
Error: shell command terminated with nonzero exit code
17920
"/usr/bin/csi -bnq -setup-mode -e \"(require-library setup-api)\" -e \"(import
s...
Aborting...
--
Jim Pryor
prof...@jimpryor.net
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
ro
epeg
formular
fpio
phoghorn
probdist
uuid-ossp
If anyone wants to look at build scripts and make suggestions for these
last ones, great. If not, I just won't bother with them.
I welcome feedback or corrections about any of this.
--
Jim Pryor
prof...@jimpryor.net
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
ogies.co.uk/henrietta.cgi?name=peep&version=0.2.2
and then manually unchunk the blob it sends me, and then do
chicken-install from the directory I've unchunked to.
Similarly for loop.
I expect doing `chicken-install peep:0.2.2` would give the same
behavior, but I haven't ver
mw (v0.2) ; setup file has (include "setup-helper") but setup-helper isn't
declared in (needs ...)
srfi-27-reference ; setup file has (include "setup-helper") but
setup-helper isn't declared in (needs ...)
--
Jim Pryor
prof...@jimpryor.net
_
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:03:17AM -0400, Jim Pryor wrote:
> I've been making slow progress refreshing the Arch Linux package scripts
> for installing eggs.
>
> I've accumulated notes about metadata and installation bugs
> in various eggs, which I will pass on soon.
Here
n, since I can't see where their
setup scripts are even detecting the state of that option. Perhaps it's
buried in some other part of the API that they're using and I haven't
yet identified. (Do install-{extension,program,script} turn to NOPs when
chicken-install is invoked wi
the .meta file, and so just read the .meta file and
ignore the .setup file? I think when I set these automation scripts up
that wasn't sufficient.
What about -require-extension in the .setup file?
--
Jim Pryor
prof...@jimpryor.net
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:28:11PM -0400, Jim Pryor wrote:
> I should have said explicitly in my earlier email: when I'm attempting
> to build package X, I've always made sure to have previously built AND
> TEMPORARILY INSTALLED any packages that X depends on. So as long
s in that
tarball; the user's own instance of the package manager
has to download the sources (and verify their md5sums) itself.
Hope this additional context is helpful!
--
Jim Pryor
prof...@jimpryor.net
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
d invocation of chicken-install *should* be
interchangeable. But they most certainly are not. Most eggs fail at this
point if I say instead:
CHICKEN_INSTALL_PREFIX="${pkgdir}/usr" chicken-install
Am I right that CHICKEN_INSTALL_PREFIX *should* work the same as the -p
option? Is there
19 matches
Mail list logo
