I have updated the egg to allow static linking. If you want to build this
yourself, consult the .setup script (numbers egg 1.802). It's not quite
perfect yet, but this should work:
csc myfile.scm -static-extensions -R numbers -X numbers
Do you just want to generate a static executable, or
Folks,
How can I compile the numbers egg statically? I tried many things but none
seems to work.
Thanks,
Mark
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Thomas,
the problem is, that closing the in and output ports of an SSL
connection attempts to do a clean shutdown of the SSL connection. This
may sometimes take a while because CHICKEN blocks the thread for I/O
longer than necessary or because the other endpoint of the
communications channel
Does adding a Connection: close change anything?
Nice idea, but it didn't help.
Cheers,
Mark
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Folks,
I just ran into a problem with the openssl egg. If I run the code below
and browse to https://localhost/ it shows the certificate and everything,
but the page keeps loading. Only when I kill the server it actually shows
the page. My guess is that close-input-port and close-output-port
Thanks, it works like a charm.
Replace -uses with -R.
cheers,
felix
On 6/12/07, Mark Voortman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
I finally managed to install fltk and the bb egg. Now I want to compile
a
simple program statically, but I can't get it to work. This is the
program
It might be that fltk someone redirects it into the void. I have no clue,
actually.
I thinks so too, and I might have to dig into the fltk internals. The
funny thing is that it only happens when I use the -R bb option. If I run
it as a batch file using the interpreter everything works fine.
Hello folks,
I finally managed to install fltk and the bb egg. Now I want to compile a
simple program statically, but I can't get it to work. This is the
program:
(bb:init)
(define w (bb:make-widget 'window 200 100))
(bb:group
w
(lambda ()
(let ([lbl (bb:make-widget 'label 200 100)])
Hi guys,
I have an urgent need to create a vector with a capacity of over 100
million elements. However, I get an out of range exception when I call
make-array since the numbers of elements is limited to 16777215. Where can
I increase this limit?
Thanks!
Mark
Mark Voortman scripsit:
I have an urgent need to create a vector with a capacity of over 100
million elements. However, I get an out of range exception when I call
make-array since the numbers of elements is limited to 16777215. Where
can
I increase this limit?
The simplest way
Hey Zbigniew,
1. Which is it, vector or array? If array, which kind (srfi-25,
array-lib, etc.)
I tried a srfi-25 array with one dimension.
2. Have you considered the GC implications?
There should be no garbage collection. I just load it into memory once and
that's it.
3. Do you need a
Thanks for the info!
Mark,
On May 10, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Mark Voortman wrote:
Where did all the space
go?
Each scheme object has a header word which stores: 1) Various type
tags and 2) the length of the object. So, the extra space went into
type tags---there are 24 bits reserved
On 4/16/07, Mark Voortman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using map-file-to-memory to map a file in memory and then use
move-memory! to read/write the contents. However, I was wondering if
it
is possible to random access the memory mapped file? For example,
read/write only the bytes
On 4/16/07, Mark Voortman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using map-file-to-memory to map a file in memory and then use
move-memory! to read/write the contents. However, I was wondering if
it
is possible to random access the memory mapped file? For example,
read/write only the bytes
I'm using map-file-to-memory to map a file in memory and then use
move-memory! to read/write the contents. However, I was wondering if it
is possible to random access the memory mapped file? For example,
read/write only the bytes at position 5 to 10. If I use move-memory! it
always starts
Hello,
Is it possible to compile the syntax-case egg into a statically linked
executable? If yes, how? If no, is there any chance this will be possible
in the near future?
Thanks,
Mark
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
16 matches
Mail list logo