I was under the impression that the QT egg was more a demo, then an
egg ment to be practical, and hence was *finished*.
I myself would like QT bindings. Considering such I decided I'd start
writing some myself; My approach was two fold, first to generate a set
of macros that would generate proper
I've attached a diff (from Chicken3 svn) of the freetype egg to get it
building and running on Chicken4. I only needed it to get text lengths
so I'm not sure that it actually renders. Regardless it's at least
part of the way there.
Nicholas "Indy" Ray
freetype.dif
magically coerce something which needs to be an exact integer.
Sorry, I don't understand this comment, if they were to do that,
set-file-position! should receive an exact number, and handle it just fine.
Nicholas "Indy" Ray
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> There's no need to implement everything at once...
>
> In this case, I'm saying that rather than accept the *wrong* argument
> (inexact integers), we have a need for larger exact integers than we can
> support at present, and the right
Bignums are nice and all, but I hardly see it as a practical necessity. Plus
if I had to choose between fix/flonums or bignums and slower number
performance, I'd choose the prior, that is why I use chicken!
Indy
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:39 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> Kon Lovett scripsit:
>
> > I a
g for
the platform (LGPL 3 has an anti-tivoization clause afaik) or where the NDA
prevents releasing of any required modifications for the platform.
Nicholas "Indy" Ray
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.o
);")
> (location c
>
> Of course, you must then compile with csc -c++.
> Jim
>
> 2009/9/21 Nicholas "Indy" Ray :
> > I've been trying to use the "ref" FFI type (as documented here:
> > http://chicken.wiki.br/man/4/Foreign%20type%20speci
I've been trying to use the "ref" FFI type (as documented here:
http://chicken.wiki.br/man/4/Foreign%20type%20specifiers#(ref TYPE) ) with
no success. Here is an example of my usage:
(print
((foreign-lambda* bool (((ref char) mC))
"C_return(mC == 'c');")
#\c))
compiling this with csc f
ated to my incorrect usage of Chicken.
>
>
> Is the above within the confines of this group? If it is, I'll send
> the code that was causing me problems, and would appreciate any help,
>
> Best regards
> Yaron
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Nicholas
Sorry, But I don't think the HTML was the major problem with the email.
First of all it's not clear what you are trying to do.
Second of all without any code to see what's generating you're errors
it's hard to diagnose.
Also things like
"(() if (opptapObj->tap == "None" then return (nil) else r
I might be doing something wrong but when doing a check-errors install
on chicken 4.1.0 I get a build error.
The Chicken install is done for macosx x86-64 with prefix set to a
directory in my home dir.
Any help diagnosing this problem would be appreciated.
Doing the install with chicken-install
Yeah, That's because it's a self signed certificate, It doesn't make
much sense to pay the $100+ fee just for wiki editing auth.
Nicholas "Indy" Ray
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Sam Varner wrote:
> When I try to edit a page on the wiki, my browser compl
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:35 PM, bill wrote:
> I'm trying my first egg, but am having a problem testing it. It says in
> the tutorial that if your egg has foreign functions you should load the .so
> file. Can somebody explain how you do that?
(load "somelib.so") loads a .so...
Indy
to get the wiki search more
functional, or alternatively would it be easy to clear the chicken
wiki index?
Nicholas "Indy" Ray
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
That's great, I've been meaning to port a few of those eggs, this will
ease my transition greatly!
Indy
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Christian
Kellermann wrote:
> Hello chicken-fans,
>
> I have spent the last days porting some eggs to chicken-4.0.0. The
> result is available as a huge diff at
err http://chicken.wiki.br/man/3/Unit%20posix#pipes for the third link.
Indy
On 4/16/09, Nicholas "Indy" Ray wrote:
> On 4/16/09, neil.bay...@gmail.com wrote:
> > First question: For various reasons, I can't switch to chicken 4 any time
> > soon. But I can'
On 4/16/09, neil.bay...@gmail.com wrote:
> First question: For various reasons, I can't switch to chicken 4 any time
> soon. But I can't find the eggs for 3.4 etc. Where are they?
Chicken-setup will download the chicken eggs, the ref is here:
http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/index
> Second questi
issue on the IPhone.
Indy
On 4/14/09, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Nicholas "Indy" Ray
> wrote:
> >
> > Alas, I feel we are getting farther from really discovering why Apple
> > has chosen to eliminate GC from the IPhone S
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:15 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
> I can understand that conservative GC is seen as a problem (it is
> by definition not reliable), but there are many GC strategies and
> a good, precise automatic memory manager that is safe for space
> complexity will actually use less sto
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:54 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
> This is so crazy. As if GC'd memory management would be less safe
> the manual memory management. The absurdity is breathtaking.
I doubt the choice is for safety, in general manually managed
applications in general make less allocations,
ode
> in Objective C, or write my own scheme -> Objective C compiler).
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Nicholas "Indy" Ray
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:15 PM, lowly coder
>> wrote:
>> > Wait ... the Apple De
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:15 PM, lowly coder
wrote:
> Wait ... the Apple Developer Agreement has strict requirements against GC?
> Where? I've never had a dev agreement say what technical things you can and
> can't do. Are they going to ban linked lists, maps, and my hand rolled
> memory allocator
I think actually getting it running should be trivial, interfacing
with cocoa might be a bit harder, but not impossible. I figure the
largest problems is that the Apple developer agreement has strict
requirements against GC, and in a GC language I figure it's likely to
run up against the memory lim
Something simular to you're pointer-pointer-ref is what I was using.
and semantically it seems to be best.
Indy
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
> Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
>
>> XQueryTree is a function from xlib:
>>
>> extern Status XQueryTree(
>> Display* /* displ
run cleanly on chiken 4 otherwise I'd appreciate getting
ahold of it for testing purposes.
Nicholas "Indy" Ray
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
g that my functions should be tail
recursive. and in my situation it'd likely be useful to just finish
the timing before the tail call, but I don't know how general that
would be.
Nicholas "Indy" Ray
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Ch
to get it within a more reasonable
amount of time would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Nicholas "Indy" Ray
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
27 matches
Mail list logo
