On Feb 26, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
John Cowan wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Hi!
A release canditate for CHICKEN 2.6 is now available at
the web-site. If you find the time, please give it a try.
Works fine under Cygwin with CMake.
Builds and installs fine under MSVC. Haven't really tested the
functionality though. It always pings my lazy-o-meter, the lack of
tests. Are there some simple tests we could agree on to validate
the build? If someone would cough those up, I could probably be
arsed to incorporate them into the CMake build, ala the CTest /
Dashboard mechanism.
I do the following (excerpted from build_chicken shell script):
DEV_ROOT="$HOME/Developer/Source/Scheme/Chicken"
DEVDIR="$DEV_ROOT/chicken"
cd $DEVDIR
case "$MODE" in
(bench | benchmark)
make bench "$@"
cd benchmarks
exec rm tmpfile.out tmpfile tmpfile.c
;;
(check)
pushd tests
export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/../.libs
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/../.libs
../csi -script srfi-18-tests.scm
../csi -R numbers -script library-tests.scm
../csi -R numbers -case-insensitive -script r4rstest.scm
../csi -R numbers -R syntax-case -script r5rs_pitfall.scm
../csc -compiler ../chicken locative-stress-test.scm -o a.out && ./
a.out; rm a.out
rm tmp*
popd
exec build_chicken bench "$@"
;;
...
esac
Then, after a "successful" build I run the 'check' as above. Note
that my version of 'runtests.sh' is a little different in that I use
numbers & ci.
The problem is no comparison against a "golden result", I must review
the output manually.
Best Wishes,
Kon
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
_______________________________________________
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
