Hi there,
I am getting a strange segfault in Chicken when I compile SRFI-19.
It happens reliably. This system is NetBSD/amd64, it happens both with
the latest release (2.41) and the latest SVN checkout (2.430).
The reason I'm posting here is that there is one thing that baffles me:
When running
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:00:16 +0200 Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I'm posting here is that there is one thing that baffles me:
> When running a backtrace with GDB, it tells me the error occurs in a
> function in lookup-table.c. But I can't find this file (or
> lookup-table.scm)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 11, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
Hi there,
I am getting a strange segfault in Chicken when I compile SRFI-19.
It happens reliably. This system is NetBSD/amd64, it happens both
with
the latest release (2.41) and the latest SVN chec
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:47:28AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote:
> srfi-19 uses srfi-29 uses lookup-table. The "srfi-29.meta" file does
> state the need for lookup-table, so I wonder why it is not installed.
> How old is your copy of srfi-29? The need for lookup-table is from
> version 1.2, quite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 11, 2006, at 11:55 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
Aha, that explains. I'm using the latest version, but I was looking
in the Chicken svn repos, libc, ld.elf_so etc. I never thought that
the compilation would use another egg! Stupid me :)
During c
On 9/11/06, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The reason I'm posting here is that there is one thing that baffles me:
When running a backtrace with GDB, it tells me the error occurs in a
function in lookup-table.c. But I can't find this file (or
lookup-table.scm) anywhere!
Hi, Peter!
look
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 08:15:22AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Hi, Peter!
>
> lookup-table.c is one source file of the lookup-table egg. The .c files
> are installed together with a compiled extension.
>
> The reason for the crash seems to be egg-dependency issues.
> I could reproduce a cras
On 9/12/06, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> LIST ALL (that is: "A-L-L") DIRECTLY AND _INDIRECTLY_ USED EXTENSIONS
> IN YOUR *.META FILES!!!
This is Really Bad News. I'm having another error (this time a bus error)
and figuring out where in the egg dependency chain this is caused will b
Attached is a patch for chicken-setup.scm that should really, really
handle dependencies correctly.
This doesn't sort out all problems, though: the generic setup-header.scm
in most of Kon's extensions passes -X easyfii and -X dollar to compilation
commands, but doesn't list them in the "need" cla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:46 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
Attached is a patch for chicken-setup.scm that should really, really
handle dependencies correctly.
This doesn't sort out all problems, though: the generic setup-
header.scm
in most of Kon's ext
10 matches
Mail list logo
