On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:22 AM, felix winkelmannbunny...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Mario Domenech
Goulartmario.goul...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that it's -block which is causing the failure. Take a look:
Indeed. On a hunch, I addeds debugging output in bit-test and
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Mario Domenech
Goulartmario.goul...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that it's -block which is causing the failure. Take a look:
Indeed. On a hunch, I addeds debugging output in bit-test and diffing the trace
output seems to indicate some bit-twiddling isuse. But why
Hello!
CHICKEN 4.1.0 has been released.
What's new:
- Many many bugfixes, in particularly to the module and syntax systems.
- The new parameter parantheses-synonyms and the command-line
option -no-parantheses-synonyms allow disabling list-like behaviour
of { ... } and [ ... ] tokens
- The
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Mario Domenech
Goulartmario.goul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Felix
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:44:27 +0200 felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
CHICKEN 4.1.0 has been released.
Thanks for this release.
I could build it and run the benchmarks fine on Linux x86
Hi Felix
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:59:48 +0200 felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Mario Domenech
Goulartmario.goul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Felix
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:44:27 +0200 felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com
wrote:
CHICKEN 4.1.0 has been
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:44:27AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
Hello!
CHICKEN 4.1.0 has been released.
Congrats on the new release!
Unfortunately, while creating a pkgsrc package for it, I have found
a bug in how the chicken-setup program is built; it needs relinking.
I hadn't noticed
