On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:32:44PM -0500, Joshua Griffith wrote:
> Peter,
>
> I used the Creative Commons licensing form that John Cowan suggested and
> placed the license texts within the image source directory:
>
> http://joshuagriffith.com/chicken/logo/license.html
> http://joshuagriffith.com
Peter,
I used the Creative Commons licensing form that John Cowan suggested and placed
the license texts within the image source directory:
http://joshuagriffith.com/chicken/logo/license.html
http://joshuagriffith.com/chicken/logo/license.txt
Will this work for you?
-Josh
On Jun 5, 2011, at 4
Joshua Griffith scripsit:
> I never put much thought into it and simply wanted to give the logo to
> the community. Perhaps it's a good idea to make that explicit. Let me
> know what license would be most convenient and I'll release it under
> that license.
I'd recommend CC-BY-3.0. This license
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 03:47:21PM -0500, Joshua Griffith wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> I never put much thought into it and simply wanted to give the logo to the
> community.
> Perhaps it's a good idea to make that explicit. Let me know what license
> would be most convenient and I'll release it un
Hello Peter,
I never put much thought into it and simply wanted to give the logo to the
community. Perhaps it's a good idea to make that explicit. Let me know what
license would be most convenient and I'll release it under that license.
Of course, if Wikipedia requires specific permission from
Hi all,
I was looking at the wikipedia page on Chicken and noticed the logo is
missing. I wanted to upload it but Wikipedia is paranoid about its
image uploads and wants absolute clarity about the license on the logo.
So here is the question: what license does our logo fall under?
Cheers,
Peter
