Hallo,
Mario Domenech Goulart escreveu:
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:49:26 +0100 Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's too bad though that the Chicken version in Sid is still 2.5.
Agreed.
I emailed the maintainer once offering help for packaging newer
Chickens,
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:49:26 +0100 Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
> > does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
> > If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed.
>
> BTW, don't forget
Hi!
> It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
> does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
> If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed.
BTW, don't forget that Debian is ported to 11 architectures. It may run
fine on i386. But does Chicken run fin
Hi Robin,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:24:10 -0800 Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/chicken-bin
>
> It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
> does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
> If not, I'll endeav
http://packages.debian.org/sid/chicken-bin
It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
If not, I'll endeavour to get it changed.
-Robin
--
Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo
