Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Chust
2011/3/11 Felix : > [...] > I haven't used these, but if QML is ECMA-Script-compliant, I see no > reason why it shouldn't work. > [...] Hello, as far as I know, the scripting engine behind Qt Quick is JavaScriptCore, which comes with WebKit. Ciao, Thomas -- When C++ is your hammer, every prob

Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-11 Thread Markus Klotzbuecher
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:43:59AM +0100, Felix wrote: > From: Markus Klotzbuecher > Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting... > Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:54:57 +0100 > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:15:15AM -0500, Felix wrote: > >> > >>

Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-11 Thread Felix
From: Markus Klotzbuecher Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting... Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:54:57 +0100 > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:15:15AM -0500, Felix wrote: >> >> This announces the availability of "SPOCK", a Scheme->JavaScript >> c

Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-10 Thread Markus Klotzbuecher
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:15:15AM -0500, Felix wrote: > > This announces the availability of "SPOCK", a Scheme->JavaScript > compiler and runtime system. It can statically compile > really-nearly-mostly R5RS-Scheme to JS or can be used to dynamically > generate code from s-expressions (say, in a

Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-10 Thread Felix
> I've got three failures here on Firefox 3.6.15, Chrome 6.0.472.62 and > Arora 0.10.2 (webkit 532.4): > > (eq? car car) FAIL Yes, this is a known bug and related to the way primitives are implemented. > (not (eq? (quote bitBlt) (string->symbol "bitBlt"))) FAIL > (not (string->number "1e3"

Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-10 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:15:15 -0500 (EST) Felix wrote: > This announces the availability of "SPOCK", a Scheme->JavaScript > compiler and runtime system. It can statically compile > really-nearly-mostly R5RS-Scheme to JS or can be used to dynamically > generate code from s-expressions (

Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-10 Thread Felix
From: John Cowan Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting... Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:57:07 -0500 >> The test-suite can be run at: > > I get one failure running on Chrome 10.0.648.127 beta for Windows: > (every-of #t) returns #f instead of #t. I'll

Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-10 Thread Erik Falor
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:15:15AM -0500, Felix wrote: > Hello! > > > This announces the availability of "SPOCK", a Scheme->JavaScript > compiler and runtime system. It can statically compile > really-nearly-mostly R5RS-Scheme to JS or can be used to dynamically > generate code from s-expressions

Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-10 Thread Jim Ursetto
On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:57 AM, John Cowan wrote: > I get one failure running on Chrome 10.0.648.127 beta for Windows: > (every-of #t) returns #f instead of #t. Same here on Safari 5.0.4 ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lis

Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-10 Thread John Cowan
Felix scripsit: > If your browser supports tags, you can try: Cool! > The test-suite can be run at: I get one failure running on Chrome 10.0.648.127 beta for Windows: (every-of #t) returns #f instead of #t. > Note that running this this takes a while and might trigger a > browser warning.

[Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...

2011-03-10 Thread Felix
Hello! This announces the availability of "SPOCK", a Scheme->JavaScript compiler and runtime system. It can statically compile really-nearly-mostly R5RS-Scheme to JS or can be used to dynamically generate code from s-expressions (say, in a web-server or CGI application). Tail-calls and first-clas