Re: [Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update

2006-03-07 Thread Thomas Chust
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, JörgF. Wittenberger wrote: Am Dienstag, den 07.03.2006, 14:51 + schrieb Thomas Chust: On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, JörgF. Wittenberger wrote: actually I must admit that I haven't used the SQLite3 egg for a real multithreaded application so far. Nevertheless I have done som

Re: [Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update

2006-03-07 Thread Thomas Chust
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, JörgF. Wittenberger wrote: [...] Would you mind to share your experiences about inference with user level threading? Background: for Askemos (www.askemos.org a kind of p2p web server with byzantine shared state of web apps) I wrote a sqlite3 binding to rscheme. Now rscheme

Re: [Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update

2006-03-07 Thread F. Wittenberger
Hi Thomas, Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 22:34 + schrieb Thomas Chust: > Hello, > > the SQLite3 bindings got a big update and now support user defined > collation sequences and SQL functions written in Scheme. They also do > automagical recompilation of stale statements now. Nice work. Would

Re: [Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update

2006-03-07 Thread F. Wittenberger
Am Dienstag, den 07.03.2006, 14:51 + schrieb Thomas Chust: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, JörgF. Wittenberger wrote: > actually I must admit that I haven't used the SQLite3 egg for a real > multithreaded application so far. Nevertheless I have done some testing, > which suggests that everything w

[Chicken-users] Optional sqlite3 egg update

2006-03-07 Thread Thomas Chust
Hello, the SQLite3 bindings got a big update and now support user defined collation sequences and SQL functions written in Scheme. They also do automagical recompilation of stale statements now. For technical reasons I had to break the "valid NULL statement" workaround for these changes, tho