John Cowan said:
>JRM's Syntax-rules Primer For The Mildly Eccentric is your friend when
>it comes to syntax-rules. Just keep reading till it stops making sense,
>then put it down. You probably know all you need to know at that point.
>When you run into roadblocks, pick it up again and reread fr
Brown Dragon scripsit:
> I am planning to learn syntax-rules soon. I did some initial reading
> when I started but it was a bit confusing so I decided to put it off
> till I had a better handle on things.
JRM's Syntax-rules Primer For The Mildly Eccentric is your friend when
it comes to syntax-ru
Hello Tobia,
>Let me start with a piece of advice: consider learning syntax-rules, or
>hygienic, new-style macros instead of the old-style define-macro. Besides
>being Scheme's standard macro >system, syntax-rules is much more friendly,
>readable and safe to use. The next version of Chicken (Ch
On 1 Nov 2008, at 2:39 am, Tobia Conforto wrote:
I got the same results with all these (amb) implementations:
- the one in the amb egg;
- the define-macro in the OP;
- my hygienic one above, both in Chicken 3 with alexpander and in
Chicken svn head;
so it's not a problem in the specific macro.
Hello,
I am learning scheme and am trying to implement the "amb" operator.
Hi. That's great!
Let me start with a piece of advice: consider learning syntax-rules,
or hygienic, new-style macros instead of the old-style define-macro.
Besides being Scheme's standard macro system, syntax-rules
